they were confronted. 34 .

They were parallel versions of the same measure. 39.

'; display:inline-block } .s320E5A8E { width:5.95pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD051EF8 { width:3.72pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s84651E4E { margin-top

It followed that there had been no violation of Article 6. 52.

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Vučković

They furthermore contended that there had likewise been no procedural or other shortcomings in the impugned criminal proceedings or indeed in the overall conduct of the Serbian authorities in respect of

They did not however provide a method of calculation for the adjustment of inflation concerning the pecuniary damage alleged by the applicant. 34.

Although the Combined Divisions acknowledged that there had been different interpretations, they held that the divergence was merely apparent since even the judgments which opposed the principle of joint

Roland C..., domicilié [...]                                       , 4°/ M.

they happen to be vulnerable (see Ristić v.

Moreover, there had been no procedural safeguards available to them. They relied on the general principles and conclusions established in the Court’s case-law concerning such cases.

contend they are not able to obtain.

    The applicants alleged that the State had failed to protect Mr   Krzysztof Olewnik’s life from the illegal actions of third parties and that there had been no effective investigation

The applicant’s sons worked as shepherds on the Lagadib grazing land, which was situated about 3 to 4 km away from the village; at times, they stayed there for up to a few days and then returned home for

In that connection they argued that he had had two options.

The applicant disagreed and stated that there was no evidence of him attempting to flee. It is undisputed that no reports were drawn up in that regard. 3.

et une “éventuelle non-conformité de la réservation du sol du garage selon le résultat de l’étude thermique qui n’a pas été remise” en l’absence de réalisation de l’étude thermique et de la transmission

RG : F19/00100 COUR D'APPEL DE LYON CHAMBRE SOCIALE C ARRÊT DU 03 NOVEMBRE 2022 APPELANTE : Société ALLIANCE RESINES [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Maïlys ROMAN

représentée par Me Roy SPITZ, avocat au barreau de NICE substitué par Me Roman GUICHARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS *-*-*-*-* COMPOSITION DE LA COUR L'affaire a