CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

914 résultats pour « Thierry NORMAND »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0306JUD003153509

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2014

6 mars 2014

There were metal bars on the window but these did not block access to fresh air.

Page 34 sur 46

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD003057508

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2015

15 décembre 2015

They must therefore be declared admissible. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC001509008

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2017

4 juillet 2017

In substance, however, they complained that they had not received their respective SPDIF pensions or other social benefits since 1999, and that there were no effective domestic remedies available to them

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402JUD002188003

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2013

2 avril 2013

Between his first and second periods of detention the applicant was released into the community, and between his second and third periods of detention there, he was detained in the Gdańsk Remand Centre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD000221505

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

They are the parents of the fourth to tenth applicants. The third applicant is the mother of Beslan Arapkhanov; the second applicant is his cousin. 8 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD004878112

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2020

26 mai 2020

If they are defamatory, the appeal has to succeed and there is no issue of examining the alternative position of fair comment. If not, the appeal will fail.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD006118308

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

They eventually let her go after her neighbours intervened.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD001386205

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2009

28 mai 2009

    On 20 June 2003 the Department of the Federal Security Service of the Chechen Republic (“the Chechen FSB”) informed the first applicant that they had not arrested Khava Magomadova as there

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD002080802

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2010

4 mars 2010

    The Court also notes that according to the relevant domestic law there were remedies that were effective at least in theory as the applicant was entitled to institute such proceedings for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD001568405

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2010

21 décembre 2010

Third, the detention order was arbitrary and not susceptible of review owing to the absence of adequate reasoning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD002801805

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2012

6 novembre 2012

The defendants’ reference to the fact that they cannot exert pressure on witnesses or victims, as the preliminary investigation is over, and that they will not abscond as they have no previous criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215JUD003540306

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

No items relevant to the investigation were found there. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC006033300

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

they had seen him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1215REP001062283

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1988

15 décembre 1988

  Its existence as a theory allows that it is at least arguable that transsexuals are born with the conflict that then becomes more apparent as they become more and more conscious of their own sex

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328DEC003364696

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

They threatened the villagers and the applicant’s brother-in-law, Kazım Çaçan, saying that they would burn down their village if they refused to be village guards.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC000385314

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2016

29 mars 2016

Nevertheless, the Expert Committee noted that there were certain shortcomings in the documentation of E.’s treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC005902100

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

There is no other factor justifying a different conclusion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD000313003

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2008

10 juillet 2008

There were so many inmates that they even had to take turns to sleep on the concrete floor. The cell was located in the basement and had a small window on the ground level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0619JUD002465002

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2008

19 juin 2008

In particular, they submitted that the applicant had been detained in satisfactory sanitary conditions. They pointed out that the applicant had not been detained in overcrowded cells.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0617JUD002697406

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2010

17 juin 2010

The existence of the remedies must be sufficiently certain both in theory and in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

Source officielle