CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

675 résultats pour « ophtalmologiste »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146071

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

On 8 November 2005 the applicant was examined by an ophthalmologist who noted a bruise on his temple. She found no symptoms of any eye infection or disease.

Source officielle

Page 34 sur 34

← Précédent

Annonces BODACC282 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

DAVID HIRSBEIN OPHTALMOLOGISTE

SIREN 798025607Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de versailles

30/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

SELARL UNIPERSONNELLE DE MEDECIN OPHTALMOLOGISTE PLANTUREUX

SIREN 802516443Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de nice

14/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

SELARL D'OPHTALMOLOGISTE VIELPEAU

SIREN 491039285Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de caen

02/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

SOCIETE D'EXERCICE LIBERAL A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE DES OPHTALMOLOGISTES BARATHON

SIREN 341890309Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de montluçon

05/04/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

SELARL DE MEDECIN OPHTALMOLOGISTE MATHILDE BROUSSARD

SIREN 819106659Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de rennes

22/02/2026

Voir →

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1221JUD003349296

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2000

21 décembre 2000

On 28 September 1994 the Deputy Governor dealt with that application and refused to call an ophthalmologist on the grounds that in the opinion of the doctors who had previously examined the applicant there

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD000520309

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2011

15 décembre 2011

The patient should also be examined by a neuropathist and ophthalmologist. D.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD003588705

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

    On 24 May 2007 and 14 January, 11 March and 29 April 2008 the applicant was repeatedly examined by medical specialists, including a psychiatrist, dermatologist, ophthalmologist, urologist

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD000265313

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

    Pursuant to the request of the applicant’s counsel filed on an unidentified date, on 31 January 2014 the applicant was examined by an ophthalmologist and was diagnosed with high-degree myopia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD002840305

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

In particular, he had his ingrowing eyelashes removed by a qualified ophthalmologist on a regular basis. No other health-related complaints had been recorded. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD003871816

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

    On 8 July 2016 the applicant was examined by a cardiologist, a neuropathologist, a vascular surgeon, a gastroenterologist, an ophthalmologist and an endocrinologist from the hospital.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD006042912

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2017

5 octobre 2017

In 2013 and 2014 the prison medical staff had organised an outpatient medical examination (in relation to tuberculosis) and a consultation by an ophthalmologist to obtain glasses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0127JUD005945000

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2005

27 janvier 2005

He has thus been able to consult an ophthalmologist ... and has been prescribed corrective glasses. He consulted a general practitioner independently of mandatory visits to the segregation unit on...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD002471006

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2016

6 octobre 2016

    Furthermore, in December 2006, April 2007, January 2008 and March 2009, as well as in May and July 2011, an ophthalmologist diagnosed the applicant with astigmatism of both eyes and prescribed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD003098302

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2007

15 novembre 2007

The applicant had been supervised by a general practitioner, an ophthalmologist, an otolaryngologist, a surgeon, a urologist, a neurologist, a psychiatrist and a dermatologist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD005244209

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2011

19 juillet 2011

    On 15 December 2009 the third applicant was examined in connection with his headaches by the ophthalmologist in Dubrava Hospital ( Klinička bolnica Dubrava ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201JUD000582110

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2016

1 décembre 2016

examinations of individuals who applied to serve in the agencies of the interior were to be conducted by the following medical experts: a surgeon, a physician, a neurologist, a psychiatrist, an ophthalmologist

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD001534315

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2020

4 juin 2020

He also reported that, despite her father’s promises to that effect, M. had not been taken to see an ophthalmologist or a paediatrician, as requested by the school doctor in view of her regular complaints

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307JUD006805913

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

    On 8 November 2005 the applicant was examined by an ophthalmologist, who noted a bruise on his temple. She found no symptoms of any eye infection or disease.

Source officielle