He noted that this period of his detention had ensued from his conviction for extortion, which was found to be unlawful by the Supreme Court after he had already served his sentence in full

Firstly, he argues that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial in the civil proceedings concerning his request for compensation for his destoyed property in so far as the Pula County Court quashed

He had complained, in particular, about his detention in Germany following his return from Thailand and about his criminal conviction in Germany.

  In so far as the applicant had been lured into the Federal Republic this "private kidnapping" (private Entführung) did not render his arrest unlawful as the subsequent approval by the authorities

His elusiveness in respect of his complaints might in fact be explained by his overriding concern with the general organisation of the constitutional and electoral system, as opposed to specific issues

It also stripped him of his service rank and limited his right to serve in law-enforcement agencies. 14.

in light of his criminal convictions.

In his appeal the applicant repeats his views as       expressed in his appeal to the Unemployment Fund.         ...

family and his own social rehabilitation."

remain suspended violated his right to respect for his family life.

  He stated that his wife and uncle were tortured and murdered in political circumstances and that he feared for his life should he return to Pakistan.

    The applicant complained of a violation of his right to respect for family life on account of the refusal of his request for a transfer to a prison closer to his family residence.

In the appeal he stated that his pension was his only income and that he supported his daughter.

conclusions d'appelante au greffe dans le délai légal notifié via RPVA par le greffe à Me Emmanuelle BAUFUME, conseil de l'appelante, le 4 juillet 2025, Vu le message notifié via RPVA en réponse hier

ordered his release on the grounds that the reasons justifying his initial detention were no longer valid. 2.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Accordingly, on 21   November 2012 another judge decided not to proceed with his appeal ( atstāt bez virzības ), asking the applicant to render it more precise. 27.

The second applicant was present during the use of force against the first applicant and his arrest.

The applicant had alleged that this contact ban infringed his rights under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention.

, had drawn up a notarised public will in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code, bequeathing his entire estate to his wife.