CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD006604210
18 décembre 2018
However, they received the first letter from the NLS, informing them about the forms of restitution provided for by law and asking them to indicate their choice, only on 23 February 2012 (see paragraph
Page 35 sur 6767
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC003732613
29 mars 2016
Ultimately they decide to have the child but they decide to do so in order to save their relationship, one might say for somewhat impure motives, they feel that having this child will keep them together
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0906DEC004456498
6 septembre 2001
Whether they do or not, there is nothing to prevent them from enlisting the aid of their clerk and his notes if they are in doubt as to the evidence which has been given.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD000511518
20 février 2020
the allegations that they had been unable to tell their stories.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC001867003
10 avril 2007
After it had explained to the applicants the nature of the accusations against them, it examined them; they signed the minutes of the hearing without making any comments; they waived their right to appeal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC002611902
1 juin 2006
The applicants complain under Article 6 § 3 (a), (b) and (d) of the Convention that they were not informed of the nature of the accusations against them until the end of their detention in police custody
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1203DEC001506721
3 décembre 2024
One of the officials inflated a rubber raft while another removed their handcuffs. The officials then forced the applicant and H. into the raft and sailed away, leaving them there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006827314
30 octobre 2018
They noted that they had discussed this with their clients and made clear that the latter approved of their decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC004867499
27 janvier 2004
They argued inter alia that their title to the property was based on hereditary succession and that, in the past, the State has actually prevented them from using the property at issue.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12619
8 octobre 2019
However, given that the children had by that time been living with their paternal relatives for two years, the court ordered that they should continue living with E.B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1218JUD000715175
18 décembre 1984
They left this matter to the Court’s discretion. 3. The Commission’s Delegate 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002941409
27 janvier 2015
Their statements were consistent, in that they all said that on seeing the police vehicles they had come out of their houses with their spouses and children out of curiosity.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0531JUD002395494
31 mai 2001
During that time, checks were made on the radio as to whether any of them were wanted. During this time, they were tied up.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC005275099
18 janvier 2000
A number of inmates interviewed by the delegation indicated that, given the upsetting effects which these restrictions had had upon their families, they no longer requested "open" visits. 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010JUD003871997
10 octobre 2002
In 1969, there were indications that the applicants’ father was beating their mother. Allegations later emerged that the father had inflicted physical abuse on the children during this period. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000897902
23 octobre 2008
There was enough room in the pit for them to stand, but not to sit down. They were hardly given any food and suffered from the cold. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC003562204
11 décembre 2012
It concluded: "This judgment brings to an end the quest of the displaced inhabitants of the Chagos Islands and their descendants for legal redress against the state directly responsible for expelling them
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527JUD006674601
27 mai 2004
They moved into a rented house but were unable to adapt to these conditions. They gave up their tenancy when offered two plots for the family at Cottingley Springs. 10.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12955
8 octobre 2020
They had not had any less intrusive legal means available to them, for instance the possibility of suspending the groups’ activities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD005527617
18 mars 2021
While there had been many steps and stages in the proceedings, the applicants considered that the Government had exaggerated this in their submission to the Court.