FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par l'association Maison de retraite Saint-François d'Assise, dont le siège est Saint-Clément-sous-Valsonne

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by Mr M.

13 of the Convention in conjunction with Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, that they were not afforded a remedy providing effective protection against

In application no. 34166/19, relying on Article   6 of the Convention, the applicant complains that his conviction was based on planted evidence, that his right to a reasoned decision was violated

to Article   18 of the Convention?

  46871/07, the applicant also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 13.

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings.

  ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION Since applicant did not have home on land in question, no interference for purposes of Article 8. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously). IV.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

The applicants’ various complaints under the Convention were communicated to the Russian and Ukrainian [1] Governments.

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

    THE GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR THE APPLICATIONS TO BE STRUCK OUT UNDER ARTICLE 37 OF THE CONVENTION 22.

    The applicant in application no. 18181/19 also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 14.

They invoke Article 2 of the Convention in this respect. They further complain that the criminal proceedings against M. and F. were unreasonably protracted in breach of Article 6 of the Convention.

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS

    Alleged violations of Article   2 of the Convention 45.

Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention 19.