Romania judgment*, that the Romanian legislation concerning the gathering and archiving of information did not provide the safeguards necessary for the protection of individuals’ private lives.

  4 if the lack of an individual removal decision was the consequence of the applicant’s own conduct.

Article 32 § 2 provided that the entity in charge of preparing the plan had to provide well-reasoned responses in writing to the individuals who had submitted proposals, and those individuals had the right

  Consequently, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.   II.   General measures   1.

  Consequently, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.   II.

Law – Article 3 ( substantive aspect ) (a)     Establishment of the facts   – In order to benefit from presumptions of fact, individuals claiming to be victims of a violation of Article

the “Parot doctrine”) adopted by the Supreme Court in a judgment of February 2006, according to which the relevant sentence adjustments and remissions were to be applied to each of the sentences individually

Such reductions were henceforth to be applied to each sentence individually.

Absence of clear domestic regulation allowing for monetary or any other form of compensation for any damage in applicants’ situation • Disproportionate burden imposed Art 46 • Execution of judgment • Individual

The first applicant owned a company of unlimited liability ( individuali įmonė ).

considered all of the routes individually. 2.

The Court concluded that no “fair balance” has been struck between the demands of the general interests of the community – namely, the integrity of the treasury – and the requirements of the individual’s

Individual   or   public   health   care   specialists   shall be restricted ... from   violating the   confidentiality of the information about   an individual

Il soutient qu'il a été mis fin à la mesure de gestion individualisée par une décision du 2 janvier 2025 et que, dès lors, la requête est irrecevable.

Law – Articles 3 and 8 (a)     Applicability – The applicant belonged to the category of “vulnerable individuals” who were entitled to State protection.

The freedom to manifest one’s beliefs also contained a negative aspect, namely the individual’s right not to manifest his or her religion or religious beliefs and not to be obliged to act in such a way

‘Benefit’ includes respecting individuals’ wishes as well as promoting their welfare.

rights could be imposed on an individual who has, for example, seriously abused a public position or whose conduct threatened to undermine the rule of law or democratic foundations.

Firstly, the courts had expressed their belief that gender reassignment was not possible where the individual concerned had been born with the opposite sexual physiological characteristics.

It also appears from the notification if the individual has been expelled due to crime. The notifications also state particulars on the individual’s health status.