This may be so even in the absence of any formal finding; it suffices that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court regards the accused as guilty.” 27.

Z... lui a présenté la photocopie d'un titre de séjour valide du 27 septembre 2005 au 26 septembre 2006 ; qu'en revanche, Madame Guilène Z... ne produit ou n'a justifié d'aucun document justifiant de

    On 14 March 2008 the Court of First Instance found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to two years of imprisonment.

The applicant was found guilty and served his prison sentence in 2008.

In particular, do the decisions of the domestic courts reflect the opinion that the applicants were guilty, notwithstanding the absence of a formal finding of guilt?

On 10 April 2006 the Zagreb County Court found the applicant guilty on charges of rape and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment.

In June 2004 the criminal court found the applicant guilty of unauthorised purchase of drugs as a repeat offender and sentenced him to thirteen years’ imprisonment.

On 20   January 2020 the Pyatigorsk Garrison Military Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment.

result, the applicant had had no opportunity to adduce evidence at an adversarial hearing, prior to the court’s decision in her case, to show that the offences had actually occurred and that she was not guilty

On 7 December 2010 the Supreme Court of Justice finally found G.R. and G.P. guilty of group rape and forced sodomy (Articles 171 (2) c) and 172 (2) c) of the Criminal Code) and sentenced them to five and

In the present case, the applicant was found guilty of a serious political offence, namely of having played an active role in an association which aimed at, inter alia , undermining the autonomy and independence

proceedings were brought against him on counts of misappropriation of public funds, holding a person against his will and belonging to an armed group (as well as against police officers who confessed their guilt

représentée par Me Marc DEBEUGNY, avocat au barreau de DUNKERQUE DEFENDEURS Madame [P] [DH], [T] [V] née le 18 Septembre 1992 à [Localité 5], demeurant [Adresse 1] représentée par Me Guillaume GUILLUY

The applicant pleaded not guilty and decided not to give evidence. Exercising his right to testimonial privilege, her husband likewise did not give evidence at trial.

However, the accused guards were found guilty only of committing the offence provided under article 154 (2) (e) of the Criminal Code.

1977 NI COMMENT LES VOLONTES DES PARTIES SE SERAIENT RENCONTREES, A VIOLE L'ARTICLE 1134 DU CODE CIVIL ; ALORS QUE, D'AUTRE PART, LA COUR D'APPEL NE POUVAIT DEDUIRE CET ACCORD DU VERSEMENT PAR M GUILLEY

On 12 July 2010 the Bila Tserkva Town Court (“the Bila Tserkva Court”) found the applicant guilty of a criminal offence and sentenced him to four years and seven months’ imprisonment.

The impugned decisions of the national courts finding the applicant guilty of a minor offence constituted an interference with his right to freedom of expression.