For example, an article of 29 April 2019 took the form of an open letter to the first applicant and was entitled “Letter to a Fascist”.

    On 17 April 2019 the Constitutional Court declared the applicants’ constitutional complaint inadmissible as being manifestly ill-founded.

A certain S. also testified not to have seen the third applicant involved in an accident on 9 April 2011. 22.

The investigating judge questioned her on 15 April 2014. She confirmed to him her previous statements. 51 .     A psychological assessment of E.A. was ordered.

However, he had managed to talk to his wife using a mobile phone. B.     Criminal proceedings against the applicant 15 .

  House of Lords Debate – 1 April 2004 On 1 April 2004, during a debate in the House or Lords, one of the questions put to the Government was whether there would be an independent inquiry into the

He argued that the date of the injury could not be disputed, since that was apparent from the medical certificate and the photographs.

Russia , no. 5953/02, § 57, 26 April 2007).

    On 12 April 2011 the Kirov District Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the exclusion order.

    In the evening of 22 May 2012, at 6.10 p.m., the police informed the public prosecutor on duty ( Journalstaatsanwalt ) of the situation in a phone call.

    On 3 April 2009 the St. Pölten Regional Court ( Landesgericht St.

  STRASBOURG 3 April 2025   FINAL   03/07/2025   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

  22026/10, §§ 23-29, 9 April 2013; and Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no.   37204/02, §§ 14-17, 30 April 2013). 265.

  At a later social services' meeting in April 1991, no change to the children's living conditions was noted.

    On 15 April 2011 the Government made a request for the case to be referred to the Grand Chamber, in accordance with Article 43 of the Convention and Rule 73.

    On 20 April 2001 the Celje District Court summoned the applicant to report to the Maribor prison to serve the prison sentence.

A first trial of eight defendants, including the applicant, on charges of conspiracy to murder (Count 1) and conspiracy to endanger the safety of an aircraft (Count 2) began in the Crown Court on 4 April

    On 11 April 1986 the public prosecutor summonsed the headteacher to appear on 29 April 1986 for questioning as a witness.

It subsequently became apparent that the applicant was involved in a number of other offences against property and offences of dishonesty.

He contacted his wife several times by phone. After 8.00 a.m., he was placed in the detention room, which had sanitary facilities and running water.