On that day at about 6.20 p.m. a group of SOBR officers in a white Gazel minivan, four officers from the T.

Until June 2003 such a claim could be lodged even during the preliminary investigation (Article 60 § 1 of the CCP, as in force until June 2003).

of twenty-six days on each occasion.

The injuries were serious and required a ten days’ in-patient treatment.

In the recording they were facing a thirty-year old man with short dark hair, dressed in red t-shirt and hooded jacket, with an umbrella in his arms.

On the same day, in the presence of the applicant and F.M. but in the absence of J M., Iz.H. and M (at that time a defendant but later classified as a witness) and despite the claims of the defendants

number of days after – see below for details).

  The particular circumstances of the case     The applicant claims that the following events occurred.

  On an unspecified date the respondent filed a counter-claim against the applicant, also seeking sole custody and child maintenance. 6.

The discrimination claim, therefore, failed.

   In February 1985 D. transferred any claims against the applicant to the limited company E. holding 25% of the shares of D., and authorised it to bring such claims in its own name.

  The applicant claims that the search was unlawful as there was no adequate legal basis for it.   37.

  The applicants’ claims 2.   The Government’s comments on those claims 3.   The Chamber’s decision on those claims 4.

ACN [commissionnaire de transport] a le 17 suivant confirmé à la société PORTS INTER le chargement le 11 précédent à la darse 1 du Port de [Localité 10] (13) d'un volume de charbon avec la précision sur

On this point, the applicant stated that he had filed a criminal complaint for theft/embezzlement in respect of these documents which, in his opinion, had been “stolen” from the case-file on the day after

    The following day the applicant went to the hospital because of pain in the chest area. He underwent an X-ray scan but no broken ribs were detected. 9 .

Are they exposed to claims by the parents for professional negligence? ... 75.

N.U. and his father R.U. were also interviewed that day in the police station. X was released the next day at 12.10 a.m. 8.     There have been no police records regarding Y.

However, the Turkish forces claim it to be on their side of the cease-fire line.