unforeseeable prolongation of his term of imprisonment from a definite 20-year sentence to an indeterminate term for the remainder of his life.

He renewed his application.

detention on remand had no relation with the exercise of his defence rights in the criminal proceedings before the Court of Appeal and that, in view of his statement that his defence concerning his detention

On the same day the applicant took up his functions as prosecutor at the Pogradec DPO. His basic remuneration was halved.

Thus, any property transferred to the defendant at any time in the six years before his conviction will be assumed to have been obtained by him as a result of his general criminal conduct.

It noted the existence of an ecchymosed yellow ‑ purplish zone on his hip and his left thigh, as well as a one ‑ centimetre ‑ long scratch on his left fist.

    The Parole Board subsequently examined his case in order to review whether his detention remained necessary for the protection of the public.

of his confinement, have been cumulatively undermined and resulted in the taking of his own life.

, difficulty in walking, bruises around both eyes, on his fingers, on the back of his right hand, on his chest, on his right thigh and calf, and a haematoma on his head.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

cognitive deterioration, mainly affecting his memory and orientation, “could have an impact on his ability to answer the questions put by the parties and to participate in his defence and could therefore

His application was rejected as unsubstantiated. 4.

The applicant also requested that M be ordered to compensate him for his pain, including his mental suffering, and to compensate his costs.

Penitentiary, where he was serving his sentence.

    On 30 January 2007 the applicant, in his own name and on behalf of his company, filed a request for the release of the property.

His wife, Ms Marinela Codrean, made a request to pursue the application on his behalf. They were represented before the Court by Mr A. Koloszi, a lawyer practising in Oradea. 2.

    The applicant appealed and requested his release.

  The applicant raises several complaints about German court decisions concerning his parental rights in his own name, but also on behalf of his child.

The applicant further asked the court to take into consideration his difficult family situation as his parents needed his support. 10.

rendition to CIA despite real and foreseeable risk of flagrantly unfair trial before the US military commission: violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 Abolition of the death penalty Extraordinary rendition