On 8 June 1976 the Court, while rejecting the applicants’ other complaints, found - that the whole period of Mr.

He stated as follows: “From 19 June 2002 to 19 June 2003 I served under contract at the Vedenskiy District ROVD ...

sFE832CA2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2002)9 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 13 June

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)12 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 June

  5561 of 3   June 2019 of the Tripoli Public Prosecutor, the applicant was examined by two psychiatrists, who concluded that the applicant suffered from a mental condition, and he should be

LOGISTIQUE JUNG LA CHAPELLE [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Loïc LE ROY, Avocat au barreau de DOUAI Assisté de Me Olivier GSELL,Avocat au barreau de COLMAR DEFENDEURAU DEFERE INTIMÉ

On 23 June 2015 the court quashed the judgment of 9 June 2011 and rejected the applicant’s claim. The decision of 23 June 2015 was not susceptible to appeal on points of law. 8.

Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } Resolution ResDH(2004)34 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 June

By a final decision on 3 June 2022, a higher-court judge upheld the applicant’s detention. According to the applicant, on 17 June 2022 he was released. Criminal proceedings are currently pending.

Sigurjonsson case delivered on 30 June 1993 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 16130/90

of the Panevėžys City District Prosecutor's Office on 11 June 1997.

France , 26 June 1991, §   34, Series A no.

Russia (nos. 57953/00 and 37392/03), judgment of 21 June 2007. Garabayev v. Russia (no. 38411/02), judgment of 7 June 2007. Igor Ivanov v. Russia (no. 34000/02), judgment of 7 June 2007. Kantyrev v.

June 1964.

On 3 June 1992 it refused a request that the shares in the property be unequal.

By judgment of 8 June 2001 the District Court recognised the applicant’s ownership rights in respect of the building.

On 4   June 2015 the applicant escaped from the hotel and subsequently left the country. His lawyer unsuccessfully tried to challenge the investigator’s decision of 2   June 2015.

He submitted that when he had been taken to the police station on 12 June 2009 he had been under the influence of drugs.

On 23 June 2008 the Odesa Commercial Court of Appeal partly allowed the appeal and quashed the decision of 20 December 2005 in view of the interpretative decision of 25 June 2007; it then closed the proceedings

On 17 June 2004 the matter was examined before the District Court.