In the case of A.G. v.

They distinguished the present case from Lobanovs , which concerned an internal investigation carried out by the governor of Daugavpils Prison (see Lobanovs v.

The proceedings were instituted on 12 March 2002.

On 26 March 2004 the Tax Office put also these companies on notice that tax audits would be carried out with respect to them as well. On 1 April 2004 IOR filed complaint wit the Directorate. 2.

    Reviews carried out in 2013 48.

data subject to notary-client privilege, carried out on 28 June 2022, on the basis of a search warrant issued by an investigator and approved by a district prosecutor.

A new investigation was authorised and carried out in relation to the same event and in relation to additional charges concerning victims K. and T.

In the case of Modestou v.

    On 14 March 2003 the applicant complained to the Moscow City Court about the delay in the proceedings in his case. 15.

On 25 March 1999 the building supervision authorities drew up a report, noting that P.V. had carried out the reconstruction without an approved plan and without a building permit.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On 3 March 2015 a human rights NGO called “Protection of Rights without Borders” (“the NGO”) filed a criminal complaint requesting the authorities to investigate the use of force by the police during the

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Between 28 March and 31 May 2005 the applicant was again placed in detention.

    The latter judgments, delivered by the House of Lords on 11 March 2004 and 28 March 2007 respectively, confirmed that Article 2 did not apply to cases where the deaths in question pre-dated

  Sokorenko; the parties’ observations;   Having deliberated in private on 5 March 2026, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

paiement de travaux ont été engagées, d'une part, par la société ATEC et le groupement d'entreprises de Mandeure contre le maître de l'ouvrage, d'autre part, par les sociétés Couvracier, Clever et Castel

    On 25 March 1986 the court accepted the applicant's request for intervention and decided to join the cases nos. 1985/423 and 1985/07. 24.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.