CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156680

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2015

10 juillet 2015

attempt to involve third parties in the tampering with evidence, was based on the fact that the applicant had transferred property in his daughter’s name, and the apparent complicity of a certain policeman

Source officielle

Page 38 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0915JUD002313604

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2011

15 septembre 2011

P., another policeman. At the material time the applicant had no formal procedural status in this latter case. 13.     On 20 March 2000 case no. 91241 and case no. 8229 were joined. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115715

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2010

31 mai 2010

This was further reflected in a number of incidents, one in which a policeman who was on duty at a polling station in Himara was injured; another in the pressure exerted upon other citizens who were casting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0717JUD002565994

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2001

17 juillet 2001

He added that the Security Directorate considered the allegations of the applicant and his lawyers regarding the alleged disappearance at the hands of the police to be an attempt to damage the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0426JUD002749615

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2018

26 avril 2018

The police had not testified about this before the Board, but the Board had no reason to doubt the police’s assessment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917DEC006640811

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2015

17 septembre 2015

#xa0; 11080/12 05/01/2012 Nunzio GUELI 11/09/1948 Naples Maurizio ALBACHIARA              11081/12 05/01/2012 Mariarosaria PERRELLA 24/12/1952 Pollica

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2584109-2798869

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2008

17 décembre 2008

Supreme Court of Justice, which found that the applicant’s guilt had been proved, despite observing that the investigation had been somewhat flawed and that “the evidence in the file indicated that the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0518DEC003870397

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2000

18 mai 2000

    On 19 January 1984 the applicants challenged NAT’s order before the multi-member first instance civil court ( polimeles protodikio ) of Piraeus relying, inter alia, on the decision of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD005021808

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

    In view of the findings of the domestic courts in the official liability case (see paragraph 11 above) according to which the applicant’s behaviour had not warranted the police’s use of force

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC000258105

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2013

2 avril 2013

On 24 December 2003 the Berezneguvate prosecutor’s office quashed the police’s order of 17 July 2003 in its entirety. The seeds remained stored at the premises of company N.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201493

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2020

29 janvier 2020

5, 10 and 11 of the Convention and the ruling of the Plenary Supreme Court of Russia dated 27   June 2013 (concerning the application of the Convention by courts of general jurisdiction), the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC001469008

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

The applicant had protested verbally about the police’s actions and one of the policemen then instructed his colleagues to arrest the applicant too.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC001735419

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

#xa0; 10 of the Convention and Article   333 of the Criminal Code (the offence of abuse of official powers), the applicants requested that a criminal investigation be opened in respect of the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316DEC006829117

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2021

16 mars 2021

legal circumstances calling for the reduction or refusal of the said compensation, as “according to the reports issued by the General Directorate of the Guardia Civil and the General Directorate of the Policia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC000674922

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

    The applicants stayed outside in the yard of the police station, where the police interviewed the first applicant, who stated that he had no objections to the police’s use of force and signed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002756795

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1995

29 novembre 1995

On 29 December 1989 the multi-member first instance civil court (Polimeles Protodikio) of Athens issued a preliminary decision ordering the applicant and Mrs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120333

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2013

7 mai 2013

It could therefore not be said that the fact that the applicant had not been timely advised by counsel to make use of her right to remain silent had come about as a consequence of the police’s omission

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 11

602d26d35258d13dbe7135be

Appel

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

barreau de PARIS, toque : R021 substituée par Me Aurélie KLINSBOCCKEL, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R021 INTIMÉS Monsieur [N] [H] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 11

602d26d35258d13dbe7135bf

Appel

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

au barreau de PARIS, toque : R021 substituée par Me Aurélie KLINSBOCCKEL, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R021 INTIMÉS Monsieur [C] [Y] [Adresse 6] [Localité 4] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 11

602d26d35258d13dbe7135c1

Appel

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

ANDRE-HESSE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R021 substitué par Me Aurélie KLINSBOCCKEL, avocat au barreau de PARIS INTIMÉS Monsieur [S] [U] [Adresse 2] [Localité 5] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA

Source officielle