CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD003459006
11 juillet 2024
The inquiries in the applicant’s case were essentially limited to questioning the staff of the detention facilities, whose statements were taken at face value, and studying the prisons’ logbooks.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC005084199
6 avril 2000
    In addition, the first and the second applicants complain under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) that at the trial stage they were not given copies of some of the evidence which the Court relied
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-149047
26 novembre 2014
His suicidality had been properly assessed at his admission to the hospital on 30 April 2012.
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
DTA_2305562_20230620
20 juin 2023
de justice administrative est satisfaite dès lors que la décision en litige préjudicie de manière suffisamment grave et immédiate à sa situation puisqu'elle l'empêche de poursuivre sa d'effectuer son stage
ECLI:CEDH:001-111124
18 avril 2012
The applicant refused to testify in open court and insisted on the truthfulness of his pre ‑ trial statements.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105JUD002676022
5 novembre 2024
The respondent State and Bulgaria had not concluded a bilateral agreement regulating the employment of spouses of staff members of the Bulgarian embassy in the respondent State.
3ème Chambre
DTA_2502314_20260414
14 avril 2026
Par un arrêté du 10 décembre 2024, le préfet du Calvados a rejeté sa demande d’admission au séjour, l’a obligé à quitter le territoire français dans un délai de trente jours et prononcé à son encontre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC005576200
30 mars 2004
The state of emergency may only be declared in accordance with a federal constitutional law. COMPLAINTS 1.
4 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007909916
28 octobre 1996
aux candidats déclarés admissibles par le jury ; que M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC000449304
18 mai 2006
The prosecution asserted that in 1994 the applicant had deceived the State: he had bought a stake in a large mining company at a privatisation tender, but had not made a return investment in the company
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD003727208
10 octobre 2017
When asked about his statement before the public prosecutor, the applicant essentially confirmed it, whilst insisting that he had not given any statement concerning the attacks in Tunceli, a city in the
4ème Chambre
DTA_2106494_20240613
13 juin 2024
Il ressort en outre des grilles d'évaluation des stages qu'elle a effectués en deuxième année de master que ses tuteurs de stage ont porté une appréciation élogieuse sur son travail.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0108DEC001603490
8 janvier 1992
  In addition, the amount of the investments was insufficient and there was also no question of force majeure in the sense of Article 19 of the Super Levy Ordinance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC003528516
13 mars 2018
He would also make the staff member of the employment office and the employment office as a whole aware of the highly interesting statements contained in report CRI(2014)2 of the European Commission against
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD001035509
28 janvier 2020
    All of the applicants’ convictions were based on a multiplicity of evidence, including: a)   statements made by the applicants at the pre-trial stage and at trial in the presence of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000822578
28 mai 1985
During this period, unavailing attempts were made on behalf of the local Health Authority to persuade the nursing staff at Oakwood to lift their ban on the admission of restricted patients. 16.
ECLI:CEDH:001-226528
3 novembre 2009
The applicant appealed that judgment to the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State ( Afdeling Bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State – “the Division”) on 21 June 2009, which appeal
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2810010-3075512
23 novembre 2009
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14459
9 janvier 2025
manner even in the absence of any involvement of the State authorities.
ECLI:CEDH:001-171988
16 février 2017
As regards the anonymous witness, the court noted that there were certain discrepancies between his first statement at the pre-trial stage on 6 November 2006 and the one made in court on 23   November
Page 38 sur 2628