final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Gianturco case delivered on 22 January 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &#

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Cihan case delivered on 30 January 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Z.R. case delivered on 15 January 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

Ministers concerning the application of former Article 54 which are, for the time being, applicable by analogy to cases transmitted to it under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having satisfied

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the A.S. case delivered on 28   March 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &#

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Halit Yalçın case delivered on 24 June 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &#

by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 8 April 2003, on 12 May 2003 and on 11 September 2003 within

3 § 2 of Protocol No. 4);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and

relatives à l’application de l’article   46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention   ;   S’étant assuré que, aux dates indiquées en annexe, dans le délai prévu par les termes du règlement amiable

de l'Homme rendu le 8 novembre 2002 dans l'affaire Sulejmanovic et autres et Sejdovic et Sulejmanovic et transmis à la même date au Comité des Ministres en vertu de l'article 46 de la Convention  

relatives à l’application de l’article   46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention   ;   S’étant assuré que le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur avait versé aux requérants les sommes prévues par

Case Judgment of Final on 77/07 CUSAN AND FAZZO 07/01/2014 07/04/2014   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Selim case delivered on 16 July 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

    SUR L’APPLICATION DES ARTICLES 46 ET 41 DE LA CONVENTION A.     Article 46 de la Convention 60.     Aux termes de cette disposition   : «   1.

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Musiał case delivered on 25 March 1999 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lietzow case delivered on 13 February 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Siglfirđingur EHF case delivered on 30 May 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the McGonnell case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Michael Matthews delivered on 15 July 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling