In the course of the investigation, he was held in custody and detained several times by the courts, before being released on 6 May 2006.

Mairie de Domgermain, 54119 Domgermain ; l'ASSOCIATION POUR LA SAUVEGARDE DU SOL ET DU SOUS-SOL TOULOIS demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêt n° 06NC01641 du 4 décembre 2008 par lequel la cour

Italy - 11519/85 Judgment 26.11.1992 Article 6 Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of civil proceedings in Court of Audit: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 31 March 2004.#Nicoleta Maria Georgescu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Amtsgericht Löbau - Germany.

OF HUMAN RIGHTS 044 23.1.2007 Press release issued by the Registrar   2008 to be “Year of Hope” for European Court   The European Court of Human Rights’ President told journalists today that

    On an unknown date the applicant instituted proceedings before the Porto Administrative Court for the enforcement of the Supreme Administrative Court’s judgment and the calculation of the

En cours d’instance, par courrier en date du 18 mars 2025, reçu le 21 mars 2025, la société Eco restauration a également demandé à la caisse des écoles de la commune de Sainte-Marie de lui régler la somme

some extent, the concomitant of that decision - moreover, decision had been taken by same court, albeit differently composed, and had been based on Assize Court's case file.

On 16 October 2006 the Warsaw District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) detained the applicant on remand on suspicion of numerous counts of fraud.

    The applicant was subsequently charged with murder (count 1), burglary (count 2), theft (count 3), handling stolen goods (count 4) and two specific acts of fraud (counts 5 and 6).

’s allegations did not warrant quashing the City Court’s judgment and referring the case to the first instance court for a new trial.

18 May 2017 - lower court’s decision upheld by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 24 January 2018 - lower court’s decisions annulled on supervision and sent for reconsideration by the Presidium

    In 2013 the Budapest High Court found the applicant guilty on two counts of preparation of the criminal offence of homicide, one count of the criminal offence of bodily injury, and one count

  In 1999 he was charged with five counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, one count of possession of military weapons and one count of creating and participating in an armed gang.

before the Berlin Regional Court.

    On 16 March 1995 the Regional Court upheld the District Court’s decision to dismiss the applicant’s action and dismissed the defendant’s counter-action.

It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on its Internet site .

    The Court of Cassation’s judgment of 13 June 2000 On 13 June 2000 the Court of Cassation admitted the applicants’ appeal against the Bakırköy Cadastral Court’s judgment of 2 February 1999

On 27 April 1990 the applicant appeared before the Worcester Crown Court and pleaded not guilty to a count of forgery and a count of deception.

The Supreme Court accepted the latter’s argument that he had learned about the character of the training course in Sekule only after he had started attending it. 27.