It appears that the extradition order became enforceable on 19 June 2013. 35.     On 28 June 2013 the Moscow migration authority dismissed the applicant’s application for temporary asylum.

    On 17 June 1998 the model was authorised by the Deputy Prosecutor General. The text of the model reiterated the wording of the STT application of 16 June 1998. 14.

Ms I. stated that the applicant had voluntarily and secretly left for Uzbekistan by bus on 10 June 2014 and that she had flown to Tashkent on 13 June 2014. 92 .

Turkey , nos. 26938/08, 41039/09, 66328/09 and 66451/09, 5   June 2012).

2020 Published on 22 June 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 42149/17 Viera PETRÍKOVÁ against Slovakia lodged on 6 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged impartiality

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mats Jacobsson case delivered on 28 June

margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2003)137 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 June

margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2004)50 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 June

He further complains under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention that due to the use of unfortunate language the Specialised Criminal Court prejudged his guilt in its detention decision of 12 June 2019, but

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2002)125 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 June

Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } Resolution ResDH(2003)99 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 June

Ukraine lodged on 21 September 2015 communicated on 24 April 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the quashing of the judgment of the Desnynskyi District Court of Kyiv of 22   June

The applicant lodged the present application with the Court on 11 June 2020. On 12 June 2020 the applicant’s request of an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court was granted.

au sein de la Marine   », «   Voici la junte militaire Ergenekon de la Marine   », «   Trois amiraux au sommet de la junte   », «   Le plan de chaos à l’origine de l’arrestation

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)27 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 June

On 3 June 2010 the Odessa Regional Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the aforementioned decision.

On 2 June 2007, after a verbal argument with a taxi driver, the taxi driver drove the applicant against his will to a police station.

    The applicant’s appeal against that decision was rejected on 3   June 2011.

His release date was set for June 2016. 1.

The applicant arrived in Vilnius from Klaipėda on 5   June 2023, that night he stayed at a hotel.