Below is a summary of the letters kept by the applicants and the replies they received from the authorities.

, frère et petit-fils M.

    The applicant contends under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that he was kept in police custody for a long time and that his detention on remand period was excessive.

    The applicant contends under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that he was kept in police custody for a long time and that his detention on remand period was excessive.

The letter contained no reference to a criminal investigation file.

They had been kept in a basement and severely beaten and tortured with electricity.

During each of those periods, he can empty the bucket, wash his hands and fill plastic bottles with drinking water. 16.

    On 16 September 2005 the President of the Košice II District Court informed the applicant that the case file concerning the maintenance dispute had been erroneously attached to the file in

    Par un jugement du 21 octobre 2014, le tribunal de grande instance fit droit à la fin de non-recevoir soulevée par le père légal et l’administrateur ad   hoc .

The file relating to the present case was also seized in its entirety. The facts relating to the seizure and the relevant proceedings are described in more detail in Annagi Hajibeyli v.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 34906/14 Štefan LUKÁČ against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 31   May   2016 as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller

AND OTHERS against Hungary and SZABOLCS MEZŐGAZDASÁGI KFT against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 15   April 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller

The Court sees no support for this complaint in the material in the case file. On 30 March 2017 the applicant was arrested and subsequently detained for the purpose of extradition.

The court found that the applicants had failed to substantiate their complaint and that it had not been supported by the material in the case file.

DECISION Application no. 49377/14 Margita LUKÁČOVÁ against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 31   May   2016 as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller

According to the Government, another competition was planned for 2015, but it remains unclear from the material in the case file whether that competition took place. 10.

Le requérant ayant déménagé en 1995 à Youglitch, ville fort éloignée de Mourmansk (Russie) où son ex-épouse et sa fille continuèrent à habiter, ses contacts avec sa fille se raréfièrent.

police station and had been informed that her son had been arrested on suspicion of a crime and had been kept in Fili-Davydkovo police station.

On the same day, the administrative offence file was submitted to the peace justice who examined it on 10   December 2011 (see “Case no. 3” below).