Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Halis Doğan v.

In 1931 the chapel was consecrated by the Greek Catholic bishop of the Przemyśl Diocese. 5.

The case was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1999 in accordance with Article 5 § 3, second sentence, of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, the Commission not having completed its examination of

de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile ainsi qu'aux entiers dépens.

    Article 5 para. 1 (Art. 5-1) of the Convention   35     The relevant part of Article 5 para. 1 (Art. 5-1) of the Convention reads as follows:     &

onto one of the courses referred to in 2 o of Article L.412-8 of the Social Security Code.

Point 19 of the Recommendations reads as follows “19.

The offence of belonging to an armed band formerly set out in Article 168 is now governed by Article 314 of the new Penal Code. 20.

Accordingly, there had been no constitutive elements of the offence under Article 180 of the Criminal Code in G.’s and others’ actions. 18.

    The applications were transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11). 5.

of religious sites or objects), 194 (intentional damage to or destruction of property) and 356 (unlawful actions) of the Criminal Code.

  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 14 OF THE CONVENTION III.   APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Pecuniary damage 1.