CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

74 résultats pour « Charlene KALFON »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214417

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

    Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their deprivation of liberty, as required by Article   5 §   4 of the

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 4

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1022JUD004948417

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2024

22 octobre 2024

The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1217JUD004152717

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2024

17 décembre 2024

The challenges brought by them against their detention were dismissed by the competent courts. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0706DEC001362788

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1989

6 juillet 1989

          Also on 5 February 1987 the Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's challenge of judge W. who, after the Federal Court's decision of 9 January 1987,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD001869320

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

intensity of their activities and their submission to its hierarchy as required under the Court of Cassation’s case-law (see Yüksel Yalçınkaya , cited above, § 184) and thus secure their conviction as charged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD000937520

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2024

10 octobre 2024

    Chapter LII of the CCrP lays down the procedure by which parties to criminal proceedings may challenge the actions or decisions of prosecuting authorities before a court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1009DEC001437988

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 1990

9 octobre 1990

  The challenge was dismissed by the Indictment Chamber on 28 March 1988, and by the Federal Court on 11 July 1988.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405DEC001795191

Admin. suprême

5 avril 1995

5 avril 1995

  Therein he reiterated his complaint that he had not been informed promptly and in detail of the acts with which he had been charged.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304DEC002899495

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1998

4 mars 1998

    Relevant domestic law         According to S. 144 of the Code on the Criminal Procedure of the Canton of Berne (Gesetz über das Strafverfahren des Kantons

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1007JUD004797899

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2004

7 octobre 2004

A trip to the ancestors’ graves and the ruins of the Shekhry Kalman will also be on offer   and everyone who wishes will have an opportunity to turn to Islam.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1023JUD001279487

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1990

23 octobre 1990

If Mrs Huber had wished to challenge the District Attorney on this point, she should have done so during the investigation. (b) The appeal to the Federal Court 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0130JUD003888497

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2003

30 janvier 2003

Bulgaria , cited above, and Filiz and Kalkan v. Turkey , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018JUD006183810

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2016

18 octobre 2016

    The applicant appealed to the Social Insurance Court of the Canton of Zurich ( Sozialversicherungsgericht des Kantons Zürich ). 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0910REP001437988

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1991

10 septembre 1991

     The Court noted that the two investigating judges charged with the investigations had so far worked very intensively, but that no assessment of the materials had yet commenced

Source officielle