The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 3 .

  This applied to both public care and alternative care.

Such claims – including claims concerning outlays incurred by a former user of a property – could be brought before a civil court only in those exceptional cases provided for in section 64 of the 1989

Serge BERTHET, Conseiller, a entendu les plaidoiries, en application de l' article 786 du Nouveau Code de Procédure Civile, sans opposition des avocats, et en a rendu compte à la Cour lors de son délibéré

VALLEIX, président et par  Mme BERTHET, greffier, auquel la minute de la décision a été remise par le magistrat signataire. I.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le trente novembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt

  The Government further argue that the present case cannot be compared to the Benthem case (Eur. Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97).

Court H.R., Benthem judgment v. the Netherlands of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

for breach of a common law duty of care lay in the circumstances of the case.

   The Commission recalls the findings of the Court in the Benthem case (Eur.

It is also established case-law that Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) guarantees to everyone who claims that an interference with his "civil rights" is unlawful   the right to submit that claim to a tribunal

  The Government submit that Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention does not apply to disputes concerning claims under public law, such as the applicant's claim to a licence to open a pharmacy

In the case of Kaykhanidi v.

    In the present case, the Court observes that the impugned proceedings concerned the applicant's compensation claim related to an alleged unlawful reassignment.

Gérard DELTEL, Président, Mme Isabelle THERY, Conseiller, Mme Nicole BERTHET, Conseiller, GREFFIER : Mme Sylvie BERTHIOT, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.

    The testimony of one of the accused, Ahmet Bereket, was obtained on commission and placed in the case file of the Assize Court on 29   July 1997. 83.

[K] [X], [Adresse 1] représentée par Me Claire BERTHEUX SCOTTE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, [Adresse 4], Toque B0350 DÉFENDERESSE Madame [J] [W], demeurant [Adresse 2], non comparante, ni représentée

Jean- Gabriel FILHOUSE, Président, Mme Isabelle THERY, Conseillère, Mme Nicole BERTHET, Conseillère, GREFFIER : Mme Sylvie BERTHIOT, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Besançon, 18 septembre 2001), que la société