On 24 March 1999 the applicant complained again to the Ministry of Justice about delays in the proceedings.

APPELANTE SC PABAJO ayant son siège social [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par SES DIRIGEANTS LEGAUX Représentée par la SCP CONGOS ET VANDENDAELE, avoués à la Cour Assistée de Maître Eric

  1 and Article 13 of the Convention, of excessive delays in the process of restitution of agricultural land. On 18 May 2015 the application was communicated to the respondent Government.

Eric GONET JUGES : М. Arnaud LEBON-BARRE : М.

APPELANT Monsieur [R] [S] né le [Date naissance 2] 1964 à [Localité 6] demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 5] - Belgique représenté par la SCP DELEFORGE FRANCHI, avoués à la Cour assisté de Maître Eric

As a result, the State authorities were responsible for a delay of nine months.

    On 18 January 1998 the applicant complained about delays in the proceedings to the Ministry of Justice.

He asserted that delays in the present case were caused first by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and then by the Supreme Court.

de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège ayant son siège social [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me François DELEFORGE, avocat au barreau de DOUAI Assistée de Me Eric

The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the delays in the restitution procedure and the lengthy uncertainty as to the scope of their restitution rights.

Application no. 40464/08 Stoyan Dimitrov PELTEKOV and others against Bulgaria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 12   January 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

20314/11 Iliya Stefanov MURDZHEV and Others against Bulgaria (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17   May 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

; urogenital system diseases lack of/delay in consultation by a specialist, lack of/delay in medical examination, lack of/delay in medical testing, failure to conduct a surgery, shortcomings in medical

The obligatory one-year review was carried out with a delay of 144   days.

octobre 2021 par le tribunal de commerce de Douai APPELANT Monsieur [I] [T] né le [Date naissance 3] 1974 à [Localité 4], de nationalité française demeurant [Adresse 1] représenté par Me Eric

PROMOTION DU PRET A PORTER (PPP) dont le siège social est situé [Adresse 5] [Localité 8] ayant pour avocat Me Eric LAFORCE, avocat au barreau de Douai DÉFENDEURS : Monsieur [S] [G] demeurant

The applicant maintained that the delay of execution had been unreasonable, without challenging the Government’s account of facts.

Such delay cannot be said to be unreasonable. They further argued that the applicant had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies available to him.

Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22   September 2022 as a Committee composed of: Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President, Erik

No convincing explanation for these delays has been given by the respondent Government.