Procedure   The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 21 June 2001.

Poland , nos. 72287/10 and 2 others, §§ 160 and 186, 7 July 2015, with further references).

against Azerbaijan and Sudaba MAMMADOVA and Zeynab AGAYEVA against Azerbaijan The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 9   January 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014, with further references).

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with   Article 39 of the Convention.

On 1   October 2015 the letter returned to the Court undelivered with remark of the post office “ non réclamé ”.

Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols

Court notes that the last domestic decision in the proceedings complained of was adopted on 15 May 2019 and served on the applicant’s representative on 28 May 2019 whereas he lodged that application with

Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with

The applicant agreed to waive any further claims against the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of the facts giving rise to the application lodged by him with the Court. THE LAW 6.

In the present case, the applicant’s representative failed to answer the Court’s requests to be informed whether he was still in contact with his client.

of 40% for not using a seat belt and for agreeing to sit in a car with a driver under the influence of alcohol (see   paragraph 1 above). 9.

sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS     511   18.10.02   Press release issued by the Registrar   ELECTION OF DEPUTY REGISTRAR   Erik

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article 37 § 2

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application could be restored to the list in accordance with Article  

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article   37

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article   37

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article   37

;        Application No. 29808/96                       by Erich