CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513JUD001523405
13 mai 2014
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD004295609
5 mars 2013
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD003494506
1 juillet 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD000816707
22 juillet 2014
Therefore, the Court cannot but conclude that the applicant’s pre-trial detention was not justified in its full length. There has thus been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. II.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001JUD003849404
1 octobre 2013
    The applicant alleged, inter alia , that the excessive length of his detention during the investigation and trial and the failure of the domestic courts to provide reasons for its repeated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0206JUD002071419
6 février 2020
    The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD001533316
18 octobre 2018
    The applicant complained that the length of his detention on remand had been excessive.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD003494205
12 juillet 2016
    Lastly, the applicant complained under Articles   3, 6 and 13 of the Convention about unfairness and length of the criminal proceedings against him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002733513
13 novembre 2014
  Where the person concerned is in custody, the Court has found that an action for damages cannot be seen as an effective remedy in respect of complaints under Article 5 § 3 about an excessive length
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001399105
4 décembre 2014
Spain (13 July 1995, Series A no. 321) the Court examined both the length of the proceedings and the risk of absconding: “76.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD002664912
23 février 2016
It also noted that the length of the proceedings resulted mainly from the complexity of the case. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD003987318
15 avril 2021
    The applicant complained that the length of her detention on remand had been excessive.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000933320
20 mai 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD004171608
29 mai 2012
    It follows that the domestic authorities extended the applicant’s detention on grounds that cannot be regarded as “sufficient” to justify its length.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002910909
26 janvier 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002911609
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD006022511
15 avril 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD001797010
29 mars 2018
    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD001093218
9 juin 2022
    The present case concerns the allegedly excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD005071119
    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.
Page 4 sur 1424