CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC002696521
17 mai 2023
8 month(s) and 7 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction     43327/21 18/08/2021 Imréné KARDOS 1953 X.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4138
16 novembre 2004
A report by a council commissioned expert found that the noise exceeded permitted levels.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD002450007
12 janvier 2017
of jurisdiction   2 months and 4 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   3 years and 11 months 3 levels of jurisdiction   1 year and 7 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   6 months and 8 days 3
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630DEC001532705
30 juin 2016
(s) of jurisdiction   1 month(s) and 16 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction   1 month(s) and 13 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction   29 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction     2 year
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC001931315
13 septembre 2018
  347/103/2013       20035/15 16/04/2015 Ghiorghe Borfălău 15/05/1954     16/04/2009   21/10/2014   5 years, 6 months and 6 days 2 levels of jurisdiction  
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC003032013
7 juillet 2020
    On 28 June 2013 the bar manager took new noise-level measurements, which confirmed that the noise level complied with the statutory thresholds. 36.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2255
26 février 2008
However, even having regard to the applicants’ submission that the noise level might have been higher than that shown by the tests (roughly between 42 and 45 dB), this did not exceed the level recommended
ECLI:CEDH:002-1336
29 septembre 2009
Any noise was likely to be restricted to office hours and unlikely to reach very high levels.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC004378221
Edit LOVESTYÁN 1970 Pivarnyikné Juhász Emőke Budapest 23/07/2015   18/05/2021   5 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction     47512/21 08/09/2021 Péter János
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC000573515
5 months and 1 day 2 levels of jurisdiction     31263/15 13/06/2015 Ciprian State Hidişan 30/03/1974     27/09/2002 17/12/2014 12 years and 2 months and 21   days 3 levels of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215DEC005604207
15 décembre 2016
; 19/06/2006   14/05/2002   09/02/2008   5 months and 15 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   1 year, 7 months and 22 days 3 levels of jurisdiction     59448/08 22/11/2008 Boguslav
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC004675615
Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Domestic
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-492255-493528
12 février 2002
Italy (no. 52918/99) (11 years and five months for two levels of jurisdiction) EUR 12,000 EUR 1,500 (13)     Luciani v.
Pôle 2 - Chambre 1
60342c65566ffd1e4cc3ad0f
17 janvier 2017
Le 7 novembre 2002, la société GIUDICELLI ARCHITECTES a transmis ce décompte à son avocat, Maître [Y], associé du cabinet LAMY LEXEL AVOCATS ASSOCIÉS en vue d'en contester le décompte.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC003892121
; 8 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 8 day(s) 4 level(s) of jurisdiction       54424/21 27/10/2021 László SÁRAI 1969 Gál Anna Budapest 31/07/2012   06/09/2021   9 year(s) and 1 month
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000233704
20 octobre 2016
and 6 months   1 level of jurisdiction 1,800   61891/09 04/08/2009 Traian POPOVICIU 13/08/1949     23/09/1998   16/02/2009   10 years and 4 months   2 levels of jurisdiction
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921DEC001538708
21 septembre 2017
months and 23 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   3 years, 2 months and 14 days 3 levels of jurisdiction Mykola Ivanovych Skutelnyk 21/01/1951 12/07/2004 25/09/2007 3 years, 2 months and 14 days 3 levels
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC003368121
case-law     33681/21 14/06/2021 Jenő CSONKA 1974 Hatlaczki Gyula Nagykáta 09/02/2016   13/05/2021   5 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 5   day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction Art. 13
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC003766404
In this respect, it noted that the measured noise levels did not reach the maximum recommended level of 40   dB.
Tribunal Administratif de Rennes
ORTA_2304704_20231213
13 décembre 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 31 août 2023, la SARL Pierre-Yves Lebel demande au tribunal de lui rembourser le crédit d'impôt " métiers de l'art " au titre de l'exercice
Page 4 sur 975