CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0226DEC002454194
26 février 1996
Jacek Hofman, a lawyer practising in Warsaw. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows: 1.
Page 4 sur 6
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0710DEC001287587
10 juillet 1990
xa0; Application No. 12875/87 by Ingrid HOFFMANN
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC007043401
8 juillet 2003
Rahn of Rahn and Bodmer, a private Swiss merchant bank, made a complaint to The Securities Association (the “TSA”) alleging that the applicants, who were respectively Managing Director and Corporate Development
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC004046198
10 septembre 2002
“Material” evidence was defined as evidence which could be seen, “on a sensible appraisal by the prosecution: (1) to be relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case; (2) to raise or possibly raise
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225877
14 juin 2023
Quoting Lord Hoffman in R(Wellington) , he observed that the requirement that the sentence be reducible could not mean that there had to be a real prospect of release for the prisoner in question.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780105
1 avril 2010
Germany , The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Peer Lorenzen, President, Renate Jaeger, Karel Jungwiert, Rait Maruste,
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0301REP001748890
1 mars 1994
It raises issues under Article 10 of the Convention. B. The proceedings 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD003940104
18 janvier 2011
He considered that the issues were essentially questions of “fact and degree” which did not raise any “new issues of principle”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD000755209
4 mars 2014
In the words of Lord Hoffmann, with whom Lords Carswell and Mance agreed: “13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003404596
11 octobre 2001
In the case of Hoffmann v. Germany, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr A. Pastor Ridruejo , President , Mr G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000628710
17 mars 2016
Lord Hoffman stated: “65. ... Although people sometimes speak of the Convention having been incorporated into domestic law, that is a misleading metaphor.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780405
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1027JUD003964798
27 octobre 2004
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC003177705
5 février 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909
17 janvier 2012
However, and “not without misgivings”, he considered that the relevant authorities, including those of this Court, suggested an irreducible life sentence would not always raise an Article 3 issue. 47.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC003796315
27 septembre 2016
On 12 February 2014 the judgment, which ran to more than 1,243 pages, including 1,019 pages specifying the details of the victims of the alleged fraud, was served on the defence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD001388602
22 décembre 2005
The applicants also submitted that they had no effective remedy whereby they could raise the issue of the excessive length of the proceedings in their case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0422JUD002183093
22 avril 1997
CJ-DE/XXIII (93) 5, and Zhou, Hofman, Gooren and Swaab, "A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality", Nature, 2 November 1995, vol. 378, p. 68).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD003964798
22 juillet 2003
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0706DEC006573101
6 juillet 2005
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex parte Reynolds [2005] UKHL 37, with which Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe agreed, Lord Hoffmann described