CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

119 résultats pour « Rainer Hofeman »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0226DEC002454194

Admin. suprême

26 février 1996

26 février 1996

Jacek Hofman, a lawyer practising in Warsaw.         The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows:   1.

Page 4 sur 6

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0710DEC001287587

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1990

10 juillet 1990

xa0;      Application No. 12875/87                       by Ingrid HOFFMANN

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC007043401

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2003

8 juillet 2003

Rahn of Rahn and Bodmer, a private Swiss merchant bank, made a complaint to The Securities Association (the “TSA”) alleging that the applicants, who were respectively Managing Director and Corporate Development

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC004046198

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2002

10 septembre 2002

“Material” evidence was defined as evidence which could be seen, “on a sensible appraisal by the prosecution: (1) to be relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case; (2) to raise or possibly raise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225877

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2023

14 juin 2023

Quoting Lord Hoffman in R(Wellington) , he observed that the requirement that the sentence be reducible could not mean that there had to be a real prospect of release for the prisoner in question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780105

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

Germany , The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0301REP001748890

Admin. suprême

1 mars 1994

1 mars 1994

It raises issues under Article 10 of the Convention.   B.     The proceedings   5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD003940104

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

He considered that the issues were essentially questions of “fact and degree” which did not raise any “new issues of principle”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD000755209

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

In the words of Lord Hoffmann, with whom Lords Carswell and Mance agreed: “13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003404596

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

In the case of Hoffmann v. Germany, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   A. Pastor Ridruejo , President ,   Mr   G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000628710

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2016

17 mars 2016

    Lord Hoffman stated: “65. ... Although people sometimes speak of the Convention having been incorporated into domestic law, that is a misleading metaphor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002780405

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

Germany , The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1027JUD003964798

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2004

27 octobre 2004

“Material” evidence was defined as evidence which could be seen, “on a sensible appraisal by the prosecution: (1) to be relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case; (2) to raise or possibly raise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC003177705

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

“Material” evidence was defined as evidence which could be seen, “on a sensible appraisal by the prosecution: (1) to be relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case; (2) to raise or possibly raise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

However, and “not without misgivings”, he considered that the relevant authorities, including those of this Court, suggested an irreducible life sentence would not always raise an Article 3 issue. 47.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC003796315

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2016

27 septembre 2016

    On 12 February 2014 the judgment, which ran to more than 1,243   pages, including 1,019 pages specifying the details of the victims of the alleged fraud, was served on the defence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD001388602

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2005

22 décembre 2005

    The applicants also submitted that they had no effective remedy whereby they could raise the issue of the excessive length of the proceedings in their case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0422JUD002183093

Admin. suprême

22 avril 1997

22 avril 1997

CJ-DE/XXIII (93) 5, and Zhou, Hofman, Gooren and Swaab, "A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality", Nature, 2   November 1995, vol. 378, p. 68).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD003964798

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2003

22 juillet 2003

“Material” evidence was defined as evidence which could be seen, “on a sensible appraisal by the prosecution: (1) to be relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case; (2) to raise or possibly raise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0706DEC006573101

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2005

6 juillet 2005

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex parte Reynolds [2005] UKHL 37, with which Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe agreed, Lord Hoffmann described

Source officielle