CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

79 résultats pour « Sami Skrander »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518JUD002727803

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2006

18 mai 2006

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD000639704

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

) against the Republic of Albania, lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mrs Ixhlale Bushati, Mr Skender

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC002163605

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

09, in respect of which the right for compensation was upheld by the administrative decision and which was not concerned by the pending proceedings reopened by the applicants, the applicant, for the same

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC003056315

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

    The same day the applicant newspaper had a two-page spread with statement by two of A’s colleagues.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208JUD000639704

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

    On the same day the bailiff decided to suspend the enforcement proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1033849-1069549

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2004

22 juin 2004

    Procedura i skład Trybunału   Skarga została wniesiona do Europejskiej Komisji Praw Człowieka w dniu 12 marca 1996 roku a następnie, 1   listopada 1998 roku, została przekazana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611JUD003316411

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2024

11 juin 2024

The applicant was notified of that decision on the same day and was given five days to demolish his building.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129JUD005284909

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2018

29 novembre 2018

    On the same date, the founding members created the following official documents: (a) a founding decision; (b) decisions authorising O.M. to represent the applicant association and submit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC000048104

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2009

2 juin 2009

They provided that where a claimant for restitution of property was a foreign national and the State of his origin had not concluded an agreement with Slovenia, granting the same right to restitution to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909REP002311893

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

  Justice Bugge wrote a concurring opinion in which he stated, inter alia, as follows:     "I have reached the same conclusion and I agree on the important points in the reasoning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0716REP001150885

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 1987

16 juillet 1987

     In its judgment pronounced the same day upholding the District Court's judgment the High Court found it appropriate, in respect of the judgment pronounced in 1981 concerning the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0911REP003457897

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 1999

11 septembre 1999

On the same date the Lithuanian reservation to Article 5 para. 3 of the Convention expired.   26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420DEC005693710

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2021

20 avril 2021

The Constitutional Court deferred the entry into force of its decision by six months and directed the legislature to enact new legislation, within the same period, to fill the legal vacuum in the 2015

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208JUD004082812

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

The appellate court considered that the applicant should have raised those issues in his complaint ( skunde ) to the first-instance court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD004458198

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2008

18 mars 2008

Furthermore, the same court needed more than three years from its decision to obtain an expert report until it in fact appointed the expert.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0221JUD004878299

Admin. suprême

21 février 2008

21 février 2008

On 7 August 2001 Mr Andrej Jakša also lodged his application, pertaining to the same factual and legal background as the original application. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD005401517

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2024

4 juillet 2024

does not mean, in itself, that the applicant’s initial complaints at domestic level were not arguable for the purposes of triggering the State’s procedural obligation to investigate (see, for example, Skant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908DEC001361810

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2020

8 septembre 2020

    Having regard to its findings in the Beshiri and Others decision, cited above, §§ 224-29, the same conclusion is valid in respect of the applicants’ complaints that there had been a breach

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0104DEC004837499

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2008

4 janvier 2008

At an undetermined time, a claim under the same provisions was lodged with the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia. 16.

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 4

← Précédent

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.