CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112
14 décembre 2017
Mr Fabrizio Rampinelli and Mr Alessandro Dal Molin 42.
Page 40 sur 57
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0226JUD005025407
26 février 2013
At the meeting, they had discussed a drug deal, namely that 10 kg of cocaine be sold to the undercover agents.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1118DEC005415516
18 novembre 2020
The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted, according to the generally recognised rules of international law, and within a period of six months
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005666509
14 septembre 2017
Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber), sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Angelika Nußberger, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Luis López Guerra, &
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1017JUD003604409
17 octobre 2013
The Court reiterates that it may only deal with an application if it is lodged with the Court within the six-month time-limit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104JUD002921712
4 novembre 2014
xa0; Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, András Sajó, Ledi Bianku, Nona Tsotsoria, Işıl Karakaş, Nebojša Vučinić, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0613JUD007763316
13 juin 2019
Section 58 ter of the Act, which deals with “cooperation with the judicial authorities”, provides: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD000409713
15 janvier 2015
The Venice Youth Court found that it remained competent to deal with the case, as the Judenburg District Court had wrongly determined its jurisdiction under Article 15(5) of the Brussels
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD006176708
13 novembre 2012
On 25 November 2006 he was charged with large-scale drug trafficking committed in conspiracy with other drug dealers.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD002674605
20 février 2014
By a judgment of 15 September 2006 the Mayskiy District Court refused to deal with the complaint.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD007102113
9 juillet 2020
In September 2002 the applicant urged the court to deal with his application faster as the visits with his child were not taking place. 13 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD006892412
6 décembre 2018
Holds that it is not required to deal with the merits of the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention; 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0906JUD001407812
6 septembre 2018
They had agreed that H.O. would pay the applicant after the deal. When asked whether he owed any money to the applicant, H.O. denied ever having borrowed from him. 12.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002702517
22 mai 2018
However, on 24 May 2011 the Szczecin Regional Court decided that the Września District Court should deal with the case. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD000949420
27 juin 2024
In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remainder of the applicants’ complaints concerning unfairness of the administrative proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD007925217
2 mars 2023
In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention raised by the applicants
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD002854321
11 décembre 2025
In view of the findings in paragraphs 9 ‑ 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD003270615
2 novembre 2023
Having regard to the above finding, the Court does not consider it necessary to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (see Valyuzhenich v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD007418617
12 septembre 2024
In view of the findings in the paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD003218321
18 septembre 2025