CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 126 résultats pour « Alexandra DEVAL »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2017

14 décembre 2017

    Mr Fabrizio Rampinelli and Mr Alessandro Dal Molin 42.

Page 40 sur 57

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0226JUD005025407

Admin. suprême

26 février 2013

26 février 2013

At the meeting, they had discussed a drug deal, namely that 10 kg of cocaine be sold to the undercover agents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1118DEC005415516

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2020

18 novembre 2020

    The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted, according to the generally recognised rules of international law, and within a period of six months

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005666509

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2017

14 septembre 2017

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber), sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of:   Angelika Nußberger, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Luis López Guerra, &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1017JUD003604409

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2013

17 octobre 2013

    The Court reiterates that it may only deal with an application if it is lodged with the Court within the six-month time-limit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104JUD002921712

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

xa0; Mark Villiger,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   András Sajó,   Ledi Bianku,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Işıl Karakaş,   Nebojša Vučinić,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0613JUD007763316

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2019

13 juin 2019

    Section 58   ter of the Act, which deals with “cooperation with the judicial authorities”, provides: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD000409713

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

    The Venice Youth Court found that it remained competent to deal with the case, as the Judenburg District Court had wrongly determined its jurisdiction under Article 15(5) of the Brussels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD006176708

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

    On 25 November 2006 he was charged with large-scale drug trafficking committed in conspiracy with other drug dealers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD002674605

Admin. suprême

20 février 2014

20 février 2014

By a judgment of 15   September 2006 the Mayskiy District Court refused to deal with the complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD007102113

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

In September 2002 the applicant urged the court to deal with his application faster as the visits with his child were not taking place. 13 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD006892412

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2018

6 décembre 2018

    Holds that it is not required to deal with the merits of the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention;   5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0906JUD001407812

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2018

6 septembre 2018

They had agreed that H.O. would pay the applicant after the deal. When asked whether he owed any money to the applicant, H.O. denied ever having borrowed from him. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002702517

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

However, on 24 May 2011 the Szczecin Regional Court decided that the Września District Court should deal with the case. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD000949420

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2024

27 juin 2024

    In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remainder of the applicants’ complaints concerning unfairness of the administrative proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD007925217

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

    In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints under Article   6 of the Convention raised by the applicants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD002854321

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2025

11 décembre 2025

In view of the findings in paragraphs   9 ‑ 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD003270615

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2023

2 novembre 2023

    Having regard to the above finding, the Court does not consider it necessary to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (see Valyuzhenich v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD007418617

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2024

12 septembre 2024

In view of the findings in the paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD003218321

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

In view of the findings in paragraphs   9 ‑ 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

Source officielle