European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

    The criminal case against the applicant and three co-accused N., Ta. and To. was sent for examination on the merits to the Mogochinskiy District Court of the Chita Region (“the District Court

Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

    The applicant’s detention at the Tverskoy District police station 23.

    The applicant appealed to the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow.

    It appears that there were certain technical errors in the text of the writ of execution and on 27   February 2008 the applicant asked the District Court to rectify them. 39.

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of:   Guido Raimondi, President,   Angelika Nußberger,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Ganna Yudkivska

The Leninskiy District Court received the applicant’s appeal on 21   October 2013.

    At about 9.40 p.m. the applicants were taken to the Severnoye Izmaylovo District police station, Moscow.

    On 19 July 2010 the first applicant complained to the Sovetskiy District Court of Makhachkala (the district court).

    The applicant was handcuffed and driven to a forest in the Balakhinskiy District of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region. 13 .

    On 19 November 2008 the Riga City Zemgale District Court (“the District Court”) examined the request in the presence of both T. and the applicant. 19.

    The criminal case against the applicant and his three co-accused, V., Ta. and To., was sent for examination on the merits to the Mogochinskiy District Court of the Chita Region (“the District

    On 16 October 2003 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Irkutsk (“the District Court”) authorised the detention of the first and third applicants and the fourth applicant’s partner pending the

    The first and second applicants, as well as KJ and the public prosecutor, lodged an appeal against the District Court’s judgment.

  En février 2002, la société Agro-Ros Ltd obtint gain de cause dans la procédure qu’elle engagea contre le conseil du district de Smilianski et chacun des requérants pour contester la décision d’

Portuguese Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Portuguese national, Ms   Tania Alexandra

However, the Court equally noted that the competent district court judge, before issuing the order, had also asked for a passport photograph of the applicant.

The Salzburg District Court tries to justify the conduct of the officers.