Greffier lors des débats : Madame Charlotte COMBARET. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 06 Octobre 2022.

Greffier lors des débats : Madame Charlotte COMBARET. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 04 Juillet 2019.

Therefore, the claim for compensation under S. 2 para. 1 (b) of the Criminal Proceedings Compensation Act had to be dismissed.

  Non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (De Santa, Abenavoli and Nicodemo). 3.   Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (Lapalorcia). B.

The overall claim amounted to PLN   874,323 (EUR 218,540). 37.

Neumeister’s claim under Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention". 15.

    The Government contested the claim. 79.

    The third applicant contested the Government’s claim that the acceleratory remedy would have been adequate in his case.

    According to the applicant, the cafe was demolished on the date the Baku Metro lodged its claim, that is 22 May 2006.

In two decisions of 15 March and 23 May 2005 the INSS again rejected the applicant’s claims, confirming its initial decision. 10.

She did not claim any set amount for damages.

    The applicants complained that they had been discriminated against as compared to another person – N.

[those claims] ...” 15.

    On 25 November 2003 the Vienna Regional Criminal Court ( Straflandesgericht ) dismissed his claim.

To substantiate her claim she submitted a bill for the sum of LTL 2,000 (approximately EUR 580). 60.     The Government contested this claim. 61.

The applicant company pointed out that before the court it had submitted three claims; the principal claim was for payment of DKK 15,200,000; the alternative claim was for payment of a lesser amount; and

This would satisfy any and all claims, costs and expenses on the part of the Applicant against the Federal Republic of Germany (i.e. against the Federation and/or the Länder ) due to placement in preventive

elle s’insérait, à savoir la future réalisation, sur la parcelle désaffectée du domaine public de l’État, du projet de promotion immobilière de la SAM   Caroli Immo, mais il indiquait aussi clairement

The Court will first examine the question whether or not the applicant can claim to be a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention.