Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des mémoires, enregistrés le 6 décembre 2022, le 12 septembre 2024 et le 10 octobre 2024, la SCI Le roc blanc, représentée par la SELARL Louit-Dutel et associés

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des mémoires, enregistrés le 6 décembre 2022, le 19 septembre 2024 et le 10 octobre 2024, la SCI Corsica, représentée par la SELARL Louit-Dutel et associés

Alain XD..., 24 / de Mme Marie-Thérèse XD..., née Le Louette, demeurant ensemble : 22200 Corlezou-en-Lemerzer, 25 / de M.

outset that the Federal Council’s decision of 26 June 1998 to confiscate and destroy the materials replaced the decision of the authorities to seise the materials for which reason the applicant had lost

It found that S. had lost the right to use the disputed flat and acknowledged the applicants’ right to use it.

On 15 November 2011 the Voroshylivskyy Court allowed the applicant’s claim in part and awarded him UAH 87,741.94 [1] in compensation for non-pecuniary damage, UAH   7,280 in respect of lost income

February 2006 the Gaia Public Prosecutors’ Office opened a criminal investigation into R.’s disappearance and ordered the tracking of R.’s mobile phone location, which appeared to have been turned off or lost

    The Government argued that following the adoption of the judgment of 28 March 2018 (see paragraph 13 above), the applicants had lost their victim status.

Young claimed £9,505 for past earnings, £10,203 for pension rights and £5,000 for travel privileges, lost as a result of his dismissal from employment, together with interest on the earnings.

    In October 1998 S.Y. instituted civil proceedings against S.V., asking the Ordzhonikidzivskyy District Court in Zaporizhzhya (“the ODC”) to declare that he had lost his right to reside in

Additionally, she claimed 20,000 Azerbaijani manats   (AZN) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and AZN   14,000 for lost profit. 4 .

    The applicant company claimed AZN 4,357,900 in respect of pecuniary damage, including AZN 360,000 for lost profit.

would normally constitute a disproportionate interference, and that the amount of compensation had to be calculated on the basis of the value of the property at the date on which ownership of it was lost

would normally constitute a disproportionate interference, and that the amount of compensation had to be calculated on the basis of the value of the property at the date on which ownership of it was lost

    In respect of pecuniary damage, the applicant claimed 893,114.74   New Azerbaijani manats (AZN) for lost earnings.

  Києва ) seeking his reinstatement, compensation for lost income and moral damage.

was statutorily exempted from court duties ( illeték – specifically, court issue fees) (see paragraph 12 below), no such duties were collected from the Kozármislény Municipality, despite its having lost

    In the present case, where the applicants lost only a potential possibility of realising a hypothetical investment on their property and then an equally hypothetical possibility of leasing

    The applicant submitted that at the time when he had lost his shareholding Vandom had had no substantial debts.