CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC006081300
11 décembre 2007
In this regard, they claimed that the ban under Sections 4 and 16 of Law no.
Page 40 sur 6767
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167965
26 septembre 2016
The applicants maintained that the interpreter had come into the cell and told them that they would be transferred to a refugee camp and had then asked them to sign documents of unknown content
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC004025398
19 mars 2002
If those who have sought the inquiry, or the company, are of the opinion that the report shows that there has been mismanagement, they can make the request at issue; it is then for the Enterprise Section
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-698236-706373
11 février 2003
They then brought a further action seeking recognition of their title to the property which had not been returned to them, but this was declared inadmissible. Grigore v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0305DEC002189493
5 mars 1996
When they had permission to collect the body, the women took it to the village and then to Dicle. After the autopsy, the body was returned to them for burial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC005278299
31 mars 2005
They further submit that the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor at the Court of Cassation was never served on them, thus depriving them of the opportunity to put forward their counter &
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0717JUD002533794
17 juillet 2003
There are some pillars in Tangentopoli [term used by the press to design the corruption system disclosed by the clean hands inquiry] that stayed outside, they should be all those who stayed inside, then
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC000786406
29 avril 2010
Mustafa Çakir then entered from the adjacent room with his hands on his head pleading with the assailants not to shoot as there were women and children among them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618JUD002565694
18 juin 2002
They were asked for their identity cards and they produced them. When the soldiers asked the witness' father to go with them, his father asked why and the witness then moved closer.
ECLI:CEDH:001-208503
8 février 2021
They told the border guards that they could not remain in Belarus and that it would be impossible for them to obtain international protection there.
ECLI:CEDH:001-174275
16 mai 2017
Finding that this was so, they declared these payments null and void and ordered the applicants to return the sums received.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1674483-1761154
24 mai 2006
The Court noted that, although the authorities had given the applicants possession of their land in the course of 2004, they had failed to take the necessary measures to this effect for about eight
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC002829895
4 juin 2002
There they met a watchman who told them that “10 or 11 people in three cars had entered this polygon on the same day at about 7.30 a.m.”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125DEC004294202
25 janvier 2007
The first-instance court acquitted A.Ş., A.Ç. and H.A. of the charges against them holding that there was insufficient evidence to convict them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC005085306
20 septembre 2011
On 19 February 2007 they supplemented the claim and asked the court to compel the Rīga City Council to reply to their letters and to compensate them for the damage sustained. 31 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD003102213
19 juin 2025
The Government contended that since the applicants had not appealed against this judgment they had been satisfied with the outcome of proceedings. 11.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11204
6 septembre 2016
war in Croatia, the applicants’ parents were taken from their home in the then occupied part of the country by two men and shot dead.
ECLI:CEDH:001-211988
1 septembre 2021
They further complain under Article 13 read together with Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention that the IPT did not afford them an effective remedy on account of their being resident outside the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0202DEC002812095
2 février 1999
The only evidence against the applicants was the admissions made by them in the course of their interviews at Castlereagh Holding Centre, which the applicants alleged were made as a result of police misconduct
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC003646908
15 mai 2012
The demonstrators followed his request and kept their distance from the police forces, who had by then surrounded them with three chains.