CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC006081300

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

In this regard, they claimed that the ban under Sections 4 and 16 of Law no.

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167965

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2016

26 septembre 2016

The applicants maintained that the interpreter had come into the cell and told them that they would be transferred to a refugee camp and had then asked them to   sign documents of unknown content

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC004025398

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2002

19 mars 2002

If those who have sought the inquiry, or the company, are of the opinion that the report shows that there has been mismanagement, they can make the request at issue; it is then for the Enterprise Section

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-698236-706373

Admin. suprême

11 février 2003

11 février 2003

They then brought a further action seeking recognition of their title to the property which had not been returned to them, but this was declared inadmissible.   Grigore v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0305DEC002189493

Admin. suprême

5 mars 1996

5 mars 1996

When they had permission to collect the body, the women took it to the village and then to Dicle. After the autopsy, the body was returned to them for burial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC005278299

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2005

31 mars 2005

They further submit that the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor at the Court of Cassation was never served on them, thus depriving them of the opportunity to put forward their counter &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0717JUD002533794

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2003

17 juillet 2003

There are some pillars in Tangentopoli [term used by the press to design the corruption system disclosed by the clean hands inquiry] that stayed outside, they should be all those who stayed inside, then

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC000786406

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2010

29 avril 2010

Mustafa Çakir then entered from the adjacent room with his hands on his head pleading with the assailants not to shoot as there were women and children among them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618JUD002565694

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

They were asked for their identity cards and they produced them. When the soldiers asked the witness' father to go with them, his father asked why and the witness then moved closer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208503

Admin. suprême

8 février 2021

8 février 2021

They told the border guards that they could not remain in Belarus and that it would be impossible for them to obtain international protection there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174275

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

Finding that this was so, they declared these payments null and void and ordered the applicants to return the sums received.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1674483-1761154

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2006

24 mai 2006

  The Court noted that, although the authorities had given the applicants possession of their land in the course of 2004, they had failed to take the necessary measures to this effect for about eight

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC002829895

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2002

4 juin 2002

There they met a watchman who told them that “10 or 11 people in three cars had entered this polygon on the same day at about 7.30 a.m.”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0125DEC004294202

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2007

25 janvier 2007

The first-instance court acquitted A.Ş., A.Ç. and H.A. of the charges against them holding that there was insufficient evidence to convict them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC005085306

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

On 19 February 2007 they supplemented the claim and asked the court to compel the Rīga City Council to reply to their letters and to compensate them for the damage sustained. 31 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD003102213

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2025

19 juin 2025

The Government contended that since the applicants had not appealed against this judgment they had been satisfied with the outcome of proceedings. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11204

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

war in Croatia, the applicants’ parents were taken from their home in the then occupied part of the country by two men and shot dead.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211988

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2021

1 septembre 2021

They further complain under Article 13 read together with Articles 8 and   10 of the Convention that the IPT did not afford them an effective remedy on account of their being resident outside the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0202DEC002812095

Admin. suprême

2 février 1999

2 février 1999

The only evidence against the applicants was the admissions made by them in the course of their interviews at Castlereagh Holding Centre, which the applicants alleged were made as a result of police misconduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC003646908

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

The demonstrators followed his request and kept their distance from the police forces, who had by then surrounded them with three chains.

Source officielle