In this connection, the Court recalls that in length-of-proceedings cases one of the characteristics of sufficient redress which may remove a litigant’s victim status relates to the amount awarded.

All amounts indicated in the appended table will be payable to the respective applicants within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

Accordingly, they requested the amount of CZK 5,213,610 (EUR   192,953.73).

In May 2016 S. brought civil proceedings against the applicant, seeking payment of the outstanding amount of the debt.

He was ordered to pay the defendant’s costs of the proceedings in an amount which was approximately double than that which he was awarded in damages.

The Ivanić Grad Municipal Court assessed the amount of damage sustained to HRK 41,050 (approximately EUR 5,473).

fille, âgé de treize à quinze ans à l'époque des faits, avait tout fait, y compris fuguer et se brouiller avec sa mère et sa soeur, pour vivre avec son père auquel elle vouait une admiration -et un amour

allait lui faciliter les choses, elle a mis le feu à la maison ; que, dans un premier temps, elle admet d'ailleurs la réalité de ses actes, autant qu'elle peut, en faisant à son mari la déclaration d'amour-haine

dont elle remettait copie aux enquêteurs ; qu'à la date du 4 février 1993, de la main de l'enfant, on pouvait lire : "je me rappelle que c'était en juillet, mon propre père me touche, il voulait faire l'amour

    The Government contested that amount. 66.

other amount suggested by the Court.

The Government consider that this amount will be an adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned violations.

The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

    On 16 February 2004 the Town Court awarded the applicant arrears in the amount of RUB 16,765.50, and on 1 April 2004 the appeal court in addition fixed a new amount of periodic payments.

from 1 December 1991 to 31   December 1995 and fixed the total amount to 5   086   200 GRD.

Housa, an amount of CZK 1,334,578,   (iii)   to Mr Luboš Macho, an amount of CZK 889,500,   (iv)   to Mr Tomáš Čuba, an amount of CZK 911,250,   (v)   to Mr Miroslav Havlák

The second and third applicants claimed the difference between the amount confiscated and the amount refunded, the interest on the amount retained at the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank

calculated from the amount of unpaid pension was paid to the applicant.

After he paid the required amount, the tax decision that imposed on him the obligation to pay the main debt was declared null and void.