TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE [Localité 1] 6ème chambre civile N° RG 25/02531 - N° Portalis DBYH-W-B7J-MMBR N° : DH/MD Copie exécutoire : Copie : Délivrée à : Maître Laurent FAVET de

On an unspecified date the applicant complained to the Basmannyy District Court of Moscow about the defendant’s failure to enforce the judgment in her favour.

On 21   September   1999 the Chernyshevskiy District Court delivered two judgments in the applicant’s favour.

However, no steps had been taken to enforce the commission's decisions in the applicants' favour.

[W] [O], domicilié [Adresse 2], contre l'arrêt rendu le 27 février 2014 par la cour d'appel de Colmar (chambre sociale, section A), dans le litige l'opposant à la société Chomette Favor, société par

C B et Mme E A D, agissant en leur nom et en celui de l'enfant Jonathan Favor B, représentés par Me Guilbaud, demandent au juge des référés : 1°) d'enjoindre à l'ambassade de France au Rwanda " de délivrer

The fact that the Finance and Control Committee was reorganised into a different state body, did not lift its obligation under the judgment in the applicant's favour.

    The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the final court judgments rendered in his favour. 4.

    The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the judgment of 12 August 2004 in his favour.

  1 about delays in the enforcement of judgments in their favour.

The applicant company complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of a judgment adopted in its favour. 4 .

    The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the four judgments in his favour listed in paragraph 6 above.

In particular she complained that her right to a fair hearing was violated by the quashing of the final and binding judgment in her favour.

    On the dates listed in the appendix the domestic courts found in the applicants’ favour against various State bodies.

Despite this the courts ruled in its favour.

    Judgments in the applicant’s favour 16.

On 27 January 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, under Article 30 [1] of the Convention.

COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of the judgment of 23 January 2003 in his favour.

The County Court established that they had each received a car in exchange for favours to the donor which were incompatible with their professional obligations.