11 to the Convention came into force (Article   5   §   2 of Protocol No.   11). 5.

  France judgment of 25   March 1999, to be published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999, §   67, and the Philis v. Greece (no.

    The Court notes that the proceedings started in July 1989 and eventually came to an end in March 2009.

Where they came to such a conclusion, the courts quashed the forfeiture of the vehicles in question as having been ordered in contravention of Article 242 § 8 of the Criminal Code, and the vehicles were

On the latter point, what is at stake for the applicant has also to be taken into account (see Philis v.

:-19.85pt } .sE9B40630 { width:19.85pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s2E3BD715 { width:11.51pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps

    The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11). 5.

Switzerland , nos. 40575/10 and 67474/10, § 58, 2 October 2018), a professional Chamber (see Philis v.

662 477, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 4], représentée par son Gérant en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège Représentée par Me Jacques AGUIRAUD de la SCP JACQUES AGUIRAUD ET PHILIPPE

enregistré le 15 avril 2021, les sociétés AB Volvo, Volvo Lastvagnar AB, Volvo Trucks France, Volvo Group Trucks France Central Europe GmbH et Renault Trucks Commercial France, représentées par Mes Lecat, Philippe

    The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11). 5.

Dans ce cadre, il a été constitué une société civile de construction vente dénommée Campus Sartre, chargée de l'acquisition foncière, ainsi qu'une société Résidence Jean-Paul Sartre, filiale de la société

Philippe CLUZEL ARRET : - contradictoire.

France; 27.6.1997, Philis v.

margin-top:12pt; margin-left:19.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-19.85pt } .s84E0254C { width:2.17pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps

Serghides,   Jolien Schukking, judges,   and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 December 2017, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that

Court HR, Philis v. Greece (No. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions for 1997, para. 35).   54.

    In each case the courts came to the same conclusion by using a similar line of reasoning, which can be summarised as follows. 52.

Zupančič, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 9 December 2014, Delivers the following judgment, which