Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller ROGNON, les observations de Me LE X..., de la société civile professionnelle RICHARD, Me FOUSSARD, avocats en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

    The Government contested that claim. 52.

and, on the other hand, the interest of the applicant company in pursuing its claim through the courts. 41.

there was no defendant to lodge such a claim against (see Kositsina v.

He also alleged that the inspector’s report of 28 January 1985, on which the Ministry’s decision was based, had not examined his claims.

The decision of the Social District Council concerned the rejection once and for all, and at a given date, of the applicant's claim.

The Court of Appeal, on 29   July   2004, made no order on the applicants’ claims against the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and dismissed the claim against the Secretary of State.

    With judgments of September 2019 the Lisbon Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s claims holding that although he had been injured while performing his professional duties, the accident

It appears from a police report dated after the event, which the applicant claims is inaccurate, that the driver of the car was found in possession of a driving licence or other identity document in the

    On 8 July 2020, following a criminal complaint and a claim for damages from F.C. and A.L., the Lisbon Criminal Court decided to convict the applicant on two counts of breach of private life

The applicant can thus no longer claim to be a “victim”, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, of the alleged violation of his rights under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention. 15.

    The minibus stopped at a police station where the officers looked at photos of some individuals and seemingly compared them to the applicant.

  They were students with a high standard of living compared to life in other villages. They were considered to be self sufficient residing on the family compound with relatives nearby.

The Government stated that the applicant failed to produce evidence to substantiate his claim that he had made substantial winnings on cash bets since 1994.

It would be different, however, if her situation were compared with that of a younger unmarried woman, who, in the same circumstances, might succeed in obtaining authorisation to take in a second child

Such a procedure could not be compared to the proceedings which had created a jurisdictional link between the applicants and the respondent State in the Güzelyurtlu and Others v.

the applicants, within three months, 100 000 French francs for non-pecuniary damage and 80 000 French francs for costs and expenses;        - dismissed the remainder of the claim

By a judgment of 28 May 2019 the Civil Court (First Hall) in its constitutional competence upheld the applicant’s claims in part.

    Sections 69, 70 and 89 of the Enforcement Act of 1996 provided as follows: Extent of the enforcement of financial claims Section 69 “The enforcement of financial claims shall be ordered and