the   United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005-VI, with reference back to Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999‑VI). 17.

favorable au requérant ne suffit en principe à lui retirer la qualité de victime que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation de la Convention ( Dalban

BATET I CANADELL 1979 3/11/2020 Spanish Spain     Miquel BUCH I MOYA 1975 3/11/2020 Spanish Spain     Narcís CLARA LLORET 1960 3/11/2020 Spanish Spain     Francesc DE DALMASES

France , 25   June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ III, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI). 29.

sufficient to deprive him of his status as a 'victim' unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention” ( Dalban

In cases concerning the press, it is circumscribed by the interest of a democratic society in ensuring and maintaining a free press (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no.

For practical reasons, Mrs Georgeta Stoicescu will continue to be called “the applicant” although this qualification should be attributed to her heir (see Dalban v. Romania [GC], no.

applicant has died after the application was lodged the close relatives are entitled to take his or her place in the proceedings, if they express their wish to do so (see, among other authorities, Dalban

on numerous occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take the applicant’s place in the proceedings, if they express their wish to do so (see, among other authorities, Dalban

Germany , 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).

The Supreme Court referred to the Dalban v.   Romania judgment of the Court ( Dalban v.   Romania [GC], no.   28114/95, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI).

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Boutet, - les conclusions de Mme Guilbaud, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Mme F..., de Me Dallemane, représentant

Dahlman whereas the remaining applicants were represented by Mr   Kristian   V.   Bonsdorff, lawyers practising in Lappeenranta and Porvoo respectively.

the applicants themselves and only continued by their relatives after their subsequent death (see Fairfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005 ‑ VI, with reference back to Dalban

France , judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36; Dalban   v. Romania [GC], no.   28114/95, §   44, ECHR 1999 ‑ VI). 20.

  France , arrêt du 31 mars 1992, série A n o 234 ‑ C, p. 89, § 26, Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI, et Malhous c.

France , 25   juin 1996, § 36, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-III, et Dalban c.   Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999-VI).

  18, § 34, et Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o   28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI). 30.

Bursuc le «   requérant   » bien qu’il faille aujourd’hui attribuer cette qualité à sa veuve (voir, parmi d’autres, l’arrêt Dalban   c.