On 12 October 2001 the Tallinn City Court awarded her 700,000   kroons (EEK – corresponding to approximately 45,000 euros (EUR)).

However, compensation (redress) for non-pecuniary damage under section 3-5 of the Compensation Act and losses of less than 10,000 [Norwegian kroner (NOK)] are not compensated under this Act.

Exceptionally, other factors may also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto “family ties” (see Kroon and Others v.

the border between Slovenia and Croatia, the applicant was stopped by the customs authorities who established that he had been carrying cash in the amount of 43,500 euros (EUR) and 730,000 Norwegian kroner

  Duty to pay court fees At the material time, the fee for filing a lawsuit before a City Court or a District Court ( tingrett ) was 4,300 Norwegian kroner (“NOK”), corresponding to approximately

Based on an overall assessment, 50,000 Danish kroner is considered to be a suitable amount of damages ...” 31.

It observed that the applicant had no means to pay the State fee of 1,000 kroons (EEK) (corresponding to approximately 64 euros (EUR)), but considered that this fact did not automatically mean that he

14-20 §§, fiska         i enskilt vatten med metspö, kastspö, pilk och liknande         handredskap som är utrustat med lina och krok

    In 1989 Mrs B., who was then the applicant’s wife, bought a property named Ekheim from him for 6,400,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK), currently corresponding to approximately 760,000 euros (EUR

The applicant was identified as Cloce (or Kroce) Sejdovic (or Sajdovic), probably born in Titograd on 5 August 1972, the son of Jusuf Sejdovic (or Sajdovic) and the brother of Zaim (ou Zain) Sejdovic (

    By a judgment of 13 September 2001 the City Court acquitted the applicants and ordered Mr Rygh to pay 183,387 Norwegian kroner (NOK) in respect of their costs.

Justices Krook and Vuori voted in favour of upholding the Court of Appeal's judgment as a whole, whereas Justices Lehtimaja and Portin found that the applicant should be acquitted and relieved of her obligation

In its judgment of 16 November 1990 (NJ 1991, no. 475), cited in the Court’s Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, the Supreme Court came to a similar finding with regard to

The applicant was convicted of aiding and abetting them, as was Mr Jensen, in his capacity as programme controller; they were sentenced to pay day-fines (dagsbøder) totalling 1,000 and 2,000 Danish kroner

14-20 §§, fiska         i enskilt vatten med metspö, kastspö, pilk och liknande         handredskap som är utrustat med lina och krok

encompasses artistic expression (see   Müller and Others v Switzerland , 24 May 1988, § 27, Series A no. 133), information of a commercial nature (see Casado Coca , cited above, §§ 35-37, and compare Krone

    The applicant sought no compensation for pecuniary damage but claimed an amount, not exceeding 1,000,000 Norwegian kroner (“NOK”, approximately 123,650 euros – “EUR”), to be determined by

14-20 §§, fiska         i enskilt vatten med metspö, kastspö, pilk och liknande         handredskap som är utrustat med lina och krok

It appears that the Hunters’ Councils received a sum of approximately 200   Danish kroner (DKK) in compensation for this.

balance between competing interests lies include the additional contribution made by the publication of the photographs to a debate of general interest, as well as the content of the photographs (see Krone