CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD004971518

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle

Page 42 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cda5bd3db21cbdd93fc4

Appel

23 avril 2018

23 avril 2018

Représenté par Me Stéphanie PRENEUX de la SELARL BAZILLE, TESSIER, PRENEUX, avocat au barreau de RENNES - No du dossier 21611034 Représenté par Me Marc-samuel LEBEL, avocat au barreau de NANTES INTIMEE

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2022:179

CJUE

10 mars 2022

10 mars 2022

Assessment of the equivalence of the relevant training – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation between Member States – Conditions on the basis of which the host Member State may challenge the level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-108136

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2011

2 décembre 2011

In the Gečas case, the proceedings lasted for nearly five years and eleven months at three levels of jurisdiction (1997-2003).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1120DEC005411022

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2025

20 novembre 2025

The proceedings thus lasted around two years and three months at one level of jurisdiction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD006283519

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2026

22 janvier 2026

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD003301022

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD005971121

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD003454421

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2023

14 décembre 2023

Armenia [Committee] nos. 41973/19 and 51266/19, § 10, 9 February 2023), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD004771122

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2024

28 mars 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:SO01258

Cassation

3 juillet 2013

3 juillet 2013

X... a été classé « level 3 » en 2004 ; qu'il a saisi la juridiction prud'homale le 30 mai 2005 pour demander la classification « level 1 » et un rappel de salaire ; que, licencié pour faute grave le 23

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD001030224

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD003934398

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

The residential function of buildings where the noise levels would be excessive would have to be terminated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0930DEC000356708

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2010

30 septembre 2010

Settlement at domestic level On 21 March 2008 the applicant sued the authorities for compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage caused by the delayed enforcement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0829DEC003664217

Admin. suprême

29 août 2019

29 août 2019

proceedings) In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that the overall length of the relevant period, less than two years and three months, for one level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC005981516

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2018

24 mai 2018

to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicants’ complaints under this head are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings, just over five years for three levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12060

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2018

10 juillet 2018

  65 retroactively amended the provisions that had been declared unconstitutional, introducing five different levels of uprating ranging between 0 and 100% of inflation depending on the amount of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC004780706

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction     47807/06 10/11/2006 Vasiliy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-97147

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

Ukrainian authorities to enhance their efforts in tackling the problem of non-enforcement of domestic courts' decisions by setting up an overall effective strategy, coordinated at the highest political level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174136

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2017

9 mai 2017

In order to prepare the apartment to be shown to the client, the guard started walking down the stairs to the lower level so as to open the blinds, as that level was completely dark.

Source officielle