CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD004971518
6 octobre 2022
Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.
Page 42 sur 978
Cour d'Appel
6253cda5bd3db21cbdd93fc4
23 avril 2018
Représenté par Me Stéphanie PRENEUX de la SELARL BAZILLE, TESSIER, PRENEUX, avocat au barreau de RENNES - No du dossier 21611034 Représenté par Me Marc-samuel LEBEL, avocat au barreau de NANTES INTIMEE
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2022:179
10 mars 2022
Assessment of the equivalence of the relevant training – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation between Member States – Conditions on the basis of which the host Member State may challenge the level
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108136
2 décembre 2011
In the Gečas case, the proceedings lasted for nearly five years and eleven months at three levels of jurisdiction (1997-2003).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1120DEC005411022
20 novembre 2025
The proceedings thus lasted around two years and three months at one level of jurisdiction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD006283519
22 janvier 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD003301022
3 avril 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD005971121
24 octobre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD003454421
14 décembre 2023
Armenia [Committee] nos. 41973/19 and 51266/19, § 10, 9 February 2023), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD004771122
28 mars 2024
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:SO01258
3 juillet 2013
X... a été classé « level 3 » en 2004 ; qu'il a saisi la juridiction prud'homale le 30 mai 2005 pour demander la classification « level 1 » et un rappel de salaire ; que, licencié pour faute grave le 23
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD001030224
10 juillet 2025
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD003934398
6 mai 2003
The residential function of buildings where the noise levels would be excessive would have to be terminated.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0930DEC000356708
30 septembre 2010
Settlement at domestic level On 21 March 2008 the applicant sued the authorities for compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage caused by the delayed enforcement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0829DEC003664217
29 août 2019
proceedings) In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that the overall length of the relevant period, less than two years and three months, for one level
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0524DEC005981516
24 mai 2018
to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicants’ complaints under this head are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings, just over five years for three levels
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12060
10 juillet 2018
65 retroactively amended the provisions that had been declared unconstitutional, introducing five different levels of uprating ranging between 0 and 100% of inflation depending on the amount of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC004780706
13 septembre 2018
Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 47807/06 10/11/2006 Vasiliy
ECLI:CEDH:001-97147
3 décembre 2009
Ukrainian authorities to enhance their efforts in tackling the problem of non-enforcement of domestic courts' decisions by setting up an overall effective strategy, coordinated at the highest political level
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174136
9 mai 2017
In order to prepare the apartment to be shown to the client, the guard started walking down the stairs to the lower level so as to open the blinds, as that level was completely dark.