CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840591
27 janvier 2009
The applicant first stated that he was the owner of a fully furnished house in the District of Kyrenia.
Page 44 sur 58
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD007278012
9 avril 2015
On 27 October 2009 the Leninskiy District Court of Penza upheld the decision of the Penza Region Directorate of the Federal Migration Service of 5 August 2009.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308
21 janvier 2021
From 10 August 2008, the Georgian armed forces withdrew from the Tskhinvali region and then from the Gori district. 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD001896707
30 octobre 2014
On 7 November 2005 the Leninskiy District Court of Saransk (“the District Court”) found in the applicant’s favour and ordered the Ministry: (a) to pay the applicant the compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD002656207
13 avril 2017
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Khanlar Hajiyev, &
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD001549209
10 janvier 2012
By a judgment of 3 August 2009 the Oktyabrskiy District Court in Vladimir examined the applicant’s complaint against the above refusal of 18 April 2009 and rejected the complaint.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0606JUD000158509
6 juin 2013
On 25 January 2007 the Kurortnyy District Prosecutor’s Office asked the hospital to submit her medical record. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD000599308
28 novembre 2013
On 14 August 2008 the Livny District Court of the Orel Region dismissed the applicant’s claims as unsubstantiated.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408DEC002910007
8 avril 2014
On 2 July 1996 the applicants instituted proceedings against the Ministry of Justice before the Milan District Court, seeking compensation for the damage they claimed to have sustained on
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0414DEC001606490
14 avril 1998
As they had not returned after about 15 minutes the remainder of the group left for Panagra (also in the Kyrenia district).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD002909295
22 septembre 2009
On 1 August 1972 the applicant entered into a contract with a public body, the Boghaz Improvement Board, for the purchase of a plot of land in the District of Famagusta.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001625990
The Court observes that these objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD001616190
27 juillet 2010
16219/90, § 20, 31 July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20 January 2009) or at a later stage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0806JUD004972511
6 août 2020
Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Ksenija Turković, President, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Aleš
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1801475-1895348
5 octobre 2006
La procédure s’acheva le 3 avril 2000, lorsque le tribunal de district de Plovdiv homologua la transaction conclue entre le parquet et le requérant, selon laquelle il reconnaissait être coupable
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0918JUD001606490
18 septembre 2009
Le chef de l’escouade du requérant ordonna à ses hommes de se répartir en trois groupes et de se retirer à Vasilia (également dans le district de Kyrenia).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003897206
15 mai 2007
In addition, Cogoleto District Council was to submit a report by 30 October 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0321DEC007007401
21 mars 2006
It was called Marina di Alessandro S.r.l. when it lodged its application with the Court, but by a resolution dated 20 November 2002 changed its name to Valico S.r.l.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD001616290
20 janvier 2009
In the case of Alexandrou v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0104DEC001446203
4 janvier 2005
The Government sent the Court four letters in which the Presidents of the Court of Appeal, the Bălţi District Court and the Orhei District Court, stated that if renal failure patients brought actions concerning