According to the official records, the applicant was arrested because he had violated public order by illegally distributing leaflets and, when requested to stop, he had been rude towards the police.

Four hearings were adjourned because the parties amended their claims. On one occasion the proceedings were postponed because the judge was on sick leave. 9.

They were adjourned either because the parties failed to appear or because the judge was on sick leave. 7.

The State Attorney’s Office argued that the document was irrelevant because a certificate on unpaid tax liabilities could not be proof of earnings. 18.

Of these, the hearing of 6   August was adjourned until 29 October because the parties did not appear.

were adjourned because witnesses defaulted and seven were postponed due to the applicant's illness. 19.

    On 6 June 1991 the examination of the appeal was further adjourned because the applicant’s lawyer was on strike. 11.

The hearing was adjourned because Mr   E.’s lawyer was absent for a valid reason.

    On 31 October 2013 the Constitutional Court, in a formation of eight judges, dismissed without prejudice the applicant company’s complaint because its vote was tied.

Third, the applicant had refused the voucher, because of slim chances that the voucher would have been provided promptly, because the voucher had not covered the price of a flat, and because the applicant

  COMPLAINTS   The applicant complains that he will be expelled to Morocco because he was sentenced to two months' imprisonment.

    The Government argued that the complaint was inadmissible because the applicant had abused her right of petition and because she had ceased to be a victim of the alleged violation.

The applicant then requested that they all drive to the police station because he wanted to speak to the officers’ manager.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 18 July 2000 and was rejected on 28 July 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widow’s benefits because he was not a woman.

La société Izi Trading, qui bénéficiait d'un contrat de licence, a pu dès lors concéder un contrat de sous-licence à la société Because, laquelle a fourni les articles querellés à la société Fnac.

He was informed that there were no benefits available to him because he was a man.

On the fourth day of trial, while K was being cross-examined, an adjournment was granted because K claimed to feel unwell.

On 14 March 2006 the judgment became final.

parties to the present civil case had been given access to that material; because the experts had not explained how they had analysed M.’s DNA profile; and because there was no evidence that the experts