CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55806
22 mars 1996
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention") Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Karlheinz Schmidt case
Page 45 sur 440
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6809
2 septembre 1998
facts of case, applicant could legitimately claim to be a victim of his uncle’s murder.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14474
20 mai 2025
Cyprus and Turkey [GC] case.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930JUD003800005
30 septembre 2008
In each case the suspected parent was eventually cleared of suspicion. In one case this was after ten days, in the other cases after much longer periods.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR03241
17 janvier 2018
SOULARD président, R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E ________________________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE
ECLI:CEDH:002-13893
17 novembre 2022
In any event, the key issue in the case rather stemmed from the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions by the domestic authorities which in the present case were more appropriately examined
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409DEC003036104
9 avril 2013
As regards non-compliance with the six-month rule, the Court has already considered in other EWK cases that the applicants should not be penalised for having tried to file a cassation appeal
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:SO01552
28 septembre 2016
FB COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 28 septembre 2016 Cassation M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093
9 juin 1998
The case is numbered 40/1997/824/1030. The first number is the case’s position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0219DEC001487820
19 février 2026
against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 19 February 2026 as a Committee composed of: Stéphane Pisani , President , Juha Lavapuro, Hugh Mercer
civ1
607943449ba5988459c41cab
25 novembre 1975
, MIT AU MONDE, EN FRANCE, LE 27 FEVRIER 1920, UN ENFANT PRENOMME JACQUES; QUE CET ENFANT FUT RECONNU, LE JOUR DE SA NAISSANCE, PAR AIME W., DE NATIONALITE BELGE, PUIS, LE 8 MARS SUIVANT, PAR SA MERE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0219DEC002032521
13e chambre
615e0e32c25a97f0381f5344
30 avril 2014
Me Philippe MERY TC CAHRTRES RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS LE TRENTE AVRIL DEUX MILLE QUATORZE, La cour d'appel de Versailles, a rendu l'arrêt suivant dans l'affaire entre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1012DEC003367096
12 octobre 2000
That reasoning cannot be transposed to the present case as, although the local authority had custodial rights over the applicant by virtue of the care order which was still in force, the orders placing
Cour d'Appel
6253cac8bd3db21cbdd8c0d7
23 juin 2008
C / SARL GALERIE DU CARRELAGE représentée par la SCP MALET SARL TOULOUSE CARRELAGE représentée par la SCP NIDECKER PRIEU-PHILIPPOT JEUSSET SCI SAN MARCO représentée par la SCP BOYER LESCAT MERLE
ECLI:CEDH:002-9518
8 février 1996
Reasonableness of the length of the proceedings Complexity of the case: although case of some complexity this alone could not justify considerable length of proceedings.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12403
2 avril 2019
In October 2004 the court hearing the case dismissed the applicant’s action outright, on the ground that the legislative amendment was a rule of “public policy” and therefore applied to pending cases that
ECLI:CEDH:002-3895
12 juin 2012
While notification might be justified in certain cases to enable the authorities effectively to coordinate and facilitate the holding of an assembly, there had been no such need in the instant case, as
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158188
29 septembre 2015
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1808
16 décembre 2008
In an order of 16 October 2007 remitting the case, the Court of Cassation stated that the judicial authority could authorise the discontinuation of nutrition if the person concerned was in a persistent