CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205939
14 octobre 2020
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
Page 46 sur 819
comm
6137267fcd580146774260aa
6 novembre 2007
réel, la société Sathel faisait valoir que la valeur des actions de la SA Eden Beach Casino, qui constituait l'un des deux actifs de la société Sek, devait être déterminée en fonction de la valeur de
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC006050315
13 novembre 2018
carried out by a person of same gender as the person giving the urine. (5) The procedure of giving the urine cannot take longer than one hour from the moment of being called to give urine.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD002989516
2 avril 2026
Maimescu; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 12 March 2026, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0225JUD005177299
25 février 2003
The approach followed in Goodwin v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 27 March 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II) could not be applied in the instant case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD007586311
22 octobre 2015
In the case of S.M. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC003588005
24 mai 2011
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2970712-3271598
17 décembre 2009
[1] Under Article 43 of the Convention, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑
ECLI:CEDH:001-174275
16 mai 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-180535
8 décembre 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3129394-3473310
20 mai 2010
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:1219DEC000493371
19 décembre 1972
The operation was carried out by the P. prison surgeon and entailed a month in P. prison hospital.
ECLI:CEDH:001-170895
12 janvier 2017
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5486
13 décembre 2001
In the present case, the interference pursued a legitimate aim, namely protection of public order and public safety.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244958
26 août 2025
On 9 December 2013 the Korosten Court remitted the case for additional investigation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC003716105
6 juillet 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002039392
17 janvier 1996
The facts of the present case are as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-142567
24 mars 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003620297
30 mai 2000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD003624914
2 mai 2017
Lastly it noted that over fifty suspects had been arrested in the case and that numerous investigative actions were still being carried out (see paragraph 40 below).