CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205939

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2020

14 octobre 2020

The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →
CC

comm

6137267fcd580146774260aa

Cassation

6 novembre 2007

6 novembre 2007

réel, la société Sathel faisait valoir que la valeur des actions de la SA Eden Beach Casino, qui constituait l'un des deux actifs de la société Sek, devait être déterminée en fonction de la valeur de

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC006050315

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

carried out by a person of same gender as the person giving the urine. (5) The procedure of giving the urine cannot take longer than one hour from the moment of being called to give urine.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD002989516

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

  Maimescu; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 12 March 2026, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0225JUD005177299

Admin. suprême

25 février 2003

25 février 2003

The approach followed in Goodwin v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 27 March 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II) could not be applied in the instant case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD007586311

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

In the case of S.M. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC003588005

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2011

24 mai 2011

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2970712-3271598

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2009

17 décembre 2009

  [1] Under Article 43 of the Convention, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174275

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180535

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2017

8 décembre 2017

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3129394-3473310

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

  [1] Under Article 43 of the Convention, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:1219DEC000493371

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 1972

19 décembre 1972

The operation was carried out by the P. prison surgeon and entailed a month in P. prison hospital.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170895

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2017

12 janvier 2017

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5486

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

In the present case, the interference pursued a legitimate aim, namely protection of public order and public safety.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244958

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

On 9 December 2013 the Korosten Court remitted the case for additional investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC003716105

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2010

6 juillet 2010

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002039392

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1996

17 janvier 1996

       The facts of the present case are as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142567

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2014

24 mars 2014

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003620297

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2000

30 mai 2000

  The circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD003624914

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

Lastly it noted that over fifty suspects had been arrested in the case and that numerous investigative actions were still being carried out (see paragraph   40 below).

Source officielle