The investigation was carried out by the hierarchical superior police authority to the Argostoli police which was even situated in the same building.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

It thus lasted less than 6 years and 5 months.

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.

The proceedings thus lasted almost eight years and ten months for three levels of jurisdiction. 7.

The proceedings had lasted for one year and eight months. The applicant had in no way contributed to their length.

Moreover, their claims had been subject to the same legal provisions and they had all asserted their rights before the same courts at more or less the same time.

On the same day a procedural hearing was held before a single judge.

In such a case the placement is to be ordered at the same time as the sentence is passed.” 20 .

(who had died in the meantime), the same court re-opened the case under the newly-discovered circumstances procedure. 7.

        Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention.

However, soon afterwards it was again suspended for the same reasons as before. It was again resumed on 15 September 2008 and suspended on 23 January 2009.

The criminal proceedings against him lasted six years and three months.

At the same time the applicant submitted further and better particulars. 28.

The non-pecuniary damage in respect of other judgments was to be paid in the same year in which the judgment in question would be enforced in accordance with the settlement plan.

    On the same date the applicant was arrested and questioned. He was released on bail on 17 November 1995. 8.

On the same date, the prosecutor questioned the applicant.

At the same time, the second-instance court remitted the case in its part concerning the exact amount of the rent due. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 14.

It thus lasted almost seven years (less twenty-one days). 70.

On the same date a search warrant for the applicant’s private and business premises was issued for the purpose of seizing documents.