PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par le Centre nautique La Fourchette, représentée par Mme Barbat-Mosconi, dont le siège est à Favone

In his letter of 30 October 2005 the applicant informed the Court that the judgment given in his favour remained non-enforced.

    The applicant complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment of 27 October 1998 given in her favour.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Articles   6   §   1 and 13 of the Convention about the lengthy non-enforcement of the court judgment in his favour.

On 30 June 2008 the Nisporeni District Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the eviction of the defendant.

When the applicants’ cases were examined on appeal, the previous judgments, which had been in their favour, were set aside.

  2911) and disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal organisation under section 7(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713).

Italy (application no. 16861/02) concerning the non-enforcement of a judgment delivered in favour of the applicant, who was transferred from his job as governor of Empoli Women’s Prison (Italy).

Daniel U..., Favrot J..., Eugénio Jean-Louis et Patrice XS... comme membres de la commission permanente, doivent, par voie de conséquence, être annulées ; Article 1er : Les opérations électorales qui se

clarify, through further evidence or expert opinion, any divergent interpretation of the evidence or whether greater harm would be caused to the children’s welfare by a decision in the applicant’s favour

COMPLAINT The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about non-enforcement of the judicial awards in their favour.

On 9 November 2001 the Prosecutor General’s Office lodged with the Supreme Court of Justice a request for annulment of the judgments in favour of the applicants.

  1 about the delayed enforcement of the judgment in her favour. THE LAW In line with the Burdov ( no.

immatriculée au RCS de [Localité 1] sous le n° 385 077 433, prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Laurent FAVET

  9929/05, 20670/05, 33678/05 and 511/06); - non-enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour and about its subsequent quashing by way of supervisory review (case   no.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, about the non-enforcement of the final decision rendered in the favour of the applicant.

By letters sent on different dates the respondent Government informed the Court that the duration of the domestic proceedings to enforce the judgments in favour of the applicants was not excessive.

The judgment in the applicant’s favour was not appealed against, became final and the Staromisky District Bailiffs’ Service (“the Bailiffs”) instituted enforcement proceedings.

On 26 July 1999 the Anenii Noi District Court ruled in favour of the applicants and ordered the Local Council to allocate 2 hectares of land to the first applicant and 1.5 hectares of land to each of his