He had also repeated his statement before the inquiring magistrate at a point where he had consulted with and was assisted by his lawyer.

A witness was then heard in his presence. 20 .

They had stated in particular that they had seen the applicant driving his car and, at the same time, using his mobile phone.

After the overthrow of the Mobutu regime in 1997 the applicant fled the country, and on 15 May 1998 he applied for asylum in the Netherlands, together with his wife and one of his daughters.

    The applicant complains that, by refusing to examine his appeal of 22   September 2008, the domestic courts violated his right to obtain a review of lawfulness of his detention.

  On 3 February 1988 he was again questioned, in the presence of his solicitor, in connection with the escape, and also in connection with his responsibility for a robbery which had taken place in

to ill-treatment and had endangered his life.

Smith in respect of his family. He has repeatedly left the jurisdiction and not tended to the needs of his family.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.   2.

    In support of his claim the plaintiff submitted a copy of the housing register, and certificates from his school and kindergarten.

His father and his brother, who had not been members of the USC, but had supported his uncle's activities, had been executed in May 1990.

to in his address to the jury.

The applicant’s capture, transfer to CIA custody and secret detention before his alleged rendition to Lithuania 52.

occupation of his caravan on his land.

D.’s behaviour was particularly insulting and indecent: he undid his trousers and showed his genitals to everyone around him, including girls.

for his confinement.

   The applicant finally considers that the Supreme Court did not duly consider all his arguments and that, following his counsel's speech and the prosecutor's reply, he could not present his

He was appraised on his administration of the case files and backlog; his diligence in rendering injunction measures and in his other responsibilities in the capacity of a single judge; his ability to

In his application no. 42225/07, he further complained under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention about his continued preventive detention beyond the ten-year period. 4.

his morbid condition".