#Verejná služba – Zmluvní zamestnanci – Výberové konanie spoločného podniku Fusion for Energy – Zoznamy úspešných uchádzačov – Vada výberového konania – Následné akty určené tretím osobám – Záujem tretích

#Strabag AG (C-462/03) ja Kostmann GmbH (C-463/03) vastaan Österreichische Bundesbahnen.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö: Bundesvergabeamt - Itävalta.

#Cemender Korkmaz, Corner House Research un The Kurdish Human Rights Project pret Eiropas Kopienu Komisiju.

than five months (see, Karaosmanoğlu and Özden , cited above, § 76) was incompatible with the requirement to hold a hearing at regular intervals, as required by Article   5 §   4 (see also Koçhan

Koopman ,   Agent , Mr   R. Lefeber , Ms   L. van Heest , Ms   A. Aagten , Ms   R. de Ruiter,   Advisers ,   Mr   P.

Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.

observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Abdulselam Tutal, Mr Burhanettin Yalçın, Mr Burak Çileli, Mr Selim Aydın and Mr Emin Koçhan

#Produktionsrestitutioner i korn- og rissektoren - stivelse fremstillet dels af majs, dels af produkter fremstillet af sukker.#Sag 13/88.

#Eelotsusetaotlus – Asutamisvabadus – Teenuste osutamise vabadus – Finantsinstrumentide turud – Direktiiv 2004/39/EÜ – Mõisted „mittekutseline klient“ ja „tarbija“ – Tingimused, mille täidetuse korral

#Közösségi védjegy – Felszólalási eljárás – A MOTO B közösségi ábrás védjegy bejelentése – Korábban nem lajstromozott MOTOBI nemzeti ábrás védjegyek – Viszonylagos kizáró ok – A korábban nem lajstromozott

Kollmann, a lawyer practising in Vienna (Austria). The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 1 October 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER

  Koopman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 29 November 2022, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT

During the above period, from 27   May   to 24 June 2016, the applicant’s detention was replaced by 24-hour house arrest (see Korban v. Ukraine , no. 26744/16, § 138, 4 July 2019). 8.

[L] d'avoir multiplié les erreurs de facturation concernant différents clients, et notamment les clients Korean AIR et JAL, lesquels se sont plaints en décembre 2016 d'erreurs sur la facturation.

  31720/02, §§   41 and 63-64, 20 September 2012; and see, as a recent authority, Korban v. Ukraine , no. 26744/16, §§ 132-36, 4 July 2019). 17.

  Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

    The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Seoul, Korea. The applicant was represented by Ms S. Butenko, a lawyer practising in Kyiv. 3.