CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD002603918
4 décembre 2025
Having questioned servicemen who had arrived at the scene immediately after the incident, it established that the applicants’ son had died of electrocution (as confirmed by his death certificate) while
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110546
23 février 2012
All attempts to save Yalçın Ercan’s life were unsuccessful and he died on the boat.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919JUD000746906
19 septembre 2017
#xa0; April 2016 which they had been unable to have executed because five of the seventeen applicants, namely Mustafa Cangöz, Nari Ataş, Mehmet   Akdeniz, İbrahim Turgut and Hatice Karaoğlu had died
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707DEC003686803
7 juillet 2009
By a letter dated 9 December 2008 the Government informed the Court that Mr Vladimir Dupin had died on 13 March 2003, that is, before the application had been lodged with the Court on 31 October 2003.
ECLI:CEDH:001-169767
22 novembre 2016
On 24   September 2011 Kan. died. On 18   October 2011 the flat was registered as vacant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD000971417
10 juillet 2025
    The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 16240/17 died on 30   March 2024, while the case was pending before the Court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-203236
25 mai 2020
As a result, K. died in hospital on 26 April 2012. On 19 April 2012 criminal proceedings were instituted in connection with the above events.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD004381316
1 décembre 2022
    On 26   July 2021 the applicants’ representative informed the Registry that the second applicant, Mr Lugachev, had died and that his alleged civil partner Ms   Klachkova expressed
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC001714621
27 janvier 2026
The carriage driver, G.D., was thrown onto the road and died a month later owing to complications resulting from the accident.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68383-68851
3 avril 2001
    Summary of the judgment [2]   Complaints   The applicant alleged that her son had died from suicide in prison due to a failure to protect his life by the prison authorities, that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD005317310
20 avril 2021
    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 3   March 2020, which they had been unable to execute because the applicant had died before the judgment had been adopted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0608DEC003694097
8 juin 1999
The applicant’s wife died in 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC001753903
11 décembre 2007
On 12 December 1988 the applicants’ father died.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004DEC006558201
4 octobre 2005
The applicant died after he had introduced the application, but his surviving daughters, Natalia and Maria, adopted the application. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807
10 avril 2018
    The third applicant died on 10   December 2007.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155555
26 mai 2015
He died on 4 January 2009. (b)     Proceedings in the domestic courts 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD006267012
6 mars 2025
Russia, no. 37406/03, §   35-36, 14   October 2008     2,340     32058/13 09/04/2013 Aleksey Anatolyevich NAVALNYY 1976 Died in 2024   Heir Yuliya Borisovna NAVALNAYA
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9389
20 janvier 2009
In the first applicant’s case, the witness in question had died before the trial.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5134
12 novembre 2002
family life Respect for private life Refusal to allow remand prisoner to attend parents' funerals: violation Facts : While the applicant was in detention on remand on a charges of theft, both his parents died
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52017
22 avril 1998
1997, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 16 June 1994 by an Italian national, Mr   Mario Pierucci who died
Page 48 sur 390
SOCIETE CIVILE PROFESSIONNELLE D'AVOCAT DIEDLER DE LA ROBERTIE
27/05/2008
Voir →