The material of the case file does not suggest that the investigation’s conclusions were based on a thorough, objective and impartial analysis of all relevant elements (see, mutatis mutandis , Kolevi v

No. 901/92, Sbornik nak. kolegii 1992/93, str. 176).   c.

Pre-Removal Detention Centre; 04/11/19 – 29/11/19 Alpina Suites shelter from where he was removed due to participation in a fight; no referral was made for housing, and he was left homeless; 02/12/19 Koressia

This means not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection with those implicated in the events but also a practical independence (see, for example, Kolevi v. Bulgari a, no.

This means not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection with those implicated in the events but also a practical independence (see, e.g., Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no.

Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 84, ECHR 2009 ‑ ..., and Kolevi v. Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, § 177, 5 November 2009). 71.

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi v.

In this connection, failure to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the person responsible (see Kolevi v.

student in Gaziantep province, that she decided to join the PKK-KCK terrorist organisation, according to her statement, following incitement by a person called ‘Ekin’, that in October 2014 she went to Kobani

prescribed by law” has been followed, the Convention refers essentially to national law and lays down the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules thereof (see, among many others, Kolevi

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent an investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case in question and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi

    The investigation’s conclusions must be based on thorough, objective and impartial analysis of all relevant elements (see, mutatis mutandis , Kolevi v.

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi v.

Failing to follow an obvious line of inquiry undermines to a decisive extent the investigation’s ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the identity of those responsible (see Kolevi v.

Koletsis and Mr N. Crăciun, lawyers practising in Bucharest.

Bulgaria , 20 March 1997, § 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, and Kolevi v. Bulgaria , no. 1108/02, § 153, 5 November 2009). II.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 52 .

Bulgaria , no. 55523/00, §§ 91 ‑ 105, ECHR 2007 ‑ IX; concerning high ‑ profile assassinations, Kolevi v.

MILYAYEVA 154 44177/08 31/08/2008 KOBESOV SHOTA ROSEBOVICH Z. MILYAYEVA 155 44179/08 22/08/2008 MAMIYEVA MARINA INALOVNA Z. MILYAYEVA 156 44180/08 28/08/2008 MARGIYEVA VENERA GRIGORYEVNA Z.